Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Charlo-Castano, Pacquiao-Spence, Romero, More

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
    now I know you’re bugging. Crawford will do Ortiz like Tito did Vargas.
    Naw, Crawford will never fight Vergil Ortiz.

    But Dud fans can grant him an imaginary victory due to the "eyeball test."

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
      here you are for your weekly mailbag b***ing and morning. If they were the same size, Crawford would fk canelo up. He literally does everything better than him other than maybe head movement. Who has canelo faced that’s like Crawford? You’re out your coke sniffing mind. Talking about Crawford doesn’t hit hard yet he stopped his last 8 opponents and has 75% ko rate. Your mom needs to confiscate your phone.
      I'm sure you would take Crawford by EASY TKO to Canelo just like you too Lil G....

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

        Naw, Crawford will never fight Vergil Ortiz.

        But Dud fans can grant him an imaginary victory due to the "eyeball test."
        Don't listen to that Clown. He's always wrong.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by kushking View Post

          Tito & Margarito aren't in the same species let alone galaxy. This takes the cake. Tito would beat the sht outta Margacheato with 1 arm behind his back, easily.
          ———-
          And I’m not disagreeing with Tito beating the crap out of Margarito. That’s true.
          I’m talking about their styles of fighting … coming forward and overwhelming their opponents with hellacious punches but against pure boxers, they get beat up like pińatas!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by aaronbnb View Post

            if Winky and Tito were not bigger than Floyd, I'd 100% pick Floyd. Tito had one punch KO power and he let his hands go; Tito would have a strong puncher's chance.
            ———
            Perhaps. Have you watched the Tito-Oscar fight. It was boxing clinic. Same as Winky.
            Tito’s only hope is a puncher’s luck. That’s all

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by blowblow View Post
              i don't buy bread's prediction.. how many times it gets the wrong result?
              What fights did he get wrong?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post

                Don't listen to that Clown. He's always wrong.
                I’m always wrong? Pretty sure you’re the one who lost your life savings and by proxy your wife on a boxing pick gone wrong, true or false? Weren’t you also the same guy on here betting that Uzbekiti (or however you spell his name) was going to beat plant? Aren’t you the same guy who swore that smith would be a better challenger against canelo than Danny Garcia was against Spence and he’d win more rounds? Yep, those were all you. The king of L’s…..in both boxing picks and in your personal life. SMH
                Last edited by Jab jab boom; 07-24-2021, 08:48 PM.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post

                  Naw, Crawford will never fight Vergil Ortiz.

                  But Dud fans can grant him an imaginary victory due to the "eyeball test."
                  stop stealing my lines. I’ve been telling you canelo groupies forever that you like to give canelo imaginary wins (especially this past week after the charlo fight) so now you wanna run the same thing, you unimaginative cornball. But in reality, nobody is scared of Ortiz and if he puts himself in position by becoming a mandatory or a champion , I’m sure the fight would happen. Doubtful that Crawford would vacate multiple titles the way your king does and then y’all justify it with the imaginary wins by saying, ahhh he’d have beaten him anyway.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                    I’m always wrong? Pretty sure you’re the one who lost your life savings and by proxy your wife on a boxing pick gone wrong, true or false? Weren’t you also the same guy on here betting that Uzbekiti (or however you spell his name) was going to beat plant? Aren’t you the same guy who swore that smith would be a better challenger against canelo than Danny Garcia was against Spence and he’d win more rounds? Yep, those were all you. The king of L’s…..in both boxing picks and in your personal life. SMH
                    I did take Uzi to beat Plant.

                    I never lost my girl over any bet. But I did get took to the cleaners betting Oscar to beat Mosley 2. Do you know Mosley admited he was on PED's for that fight??? So did I really lose or was I cheated???

                    Don't remember the DG and Smith bet??? But was I wrong if I did??? Both got handled like Lil kids. Don't tell me you had DG winning Nelson Vasquez Jr.

                    I'm not the idiot always saying EASY DOE. When it comes to 2 HIGHLY ranked fighters...

                    That be YOU Mr. Vasquez.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                      stop stealing my lines. I’ve been telling you canelo groupies forever that you like to give canelo imaginary wins (especially this past week after the charlo fight) so now you wanna run the same thing, you unimaginative cornball. But in reality, nobody is scared of Ortiz and if he puts himself in position by becoming a mandatory or a champion , I’m sure the fight would happen. Doubtful that Crawford would vacate multiple titles the way your king does and then y’all justify it with the imaginary wins by saying, ahhh he’d have beaten him anyway.
                      Canelo actually fights people. He has the best resume in boxing besides Pacquiao.

                      Asking me to believe that Dud would actually get in the ring with Vergil Ortiz is farfetched based on the track record. And then claiming an easy win for Crawford on top of it?

                      It's easy to live in a fantasy world where Dud never has to actually prove any of this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP