I'm always surprised to see Glen Johnson labelled as a journeyman. True, he isn't the most stylish or talented of fighters, but he's always intended to reach the top, a feat which he has now achieved.
But is a journeyman necessarily a bad thing? Not every fighter is going to have the talent to reach world class level - if a fighter enters the sport as a profession just to make money at, say, British or European level, is that a bad thing?
People call Danny Williams a journeyman, but his attention has always been to get to the top - so is it an ability or intention thing?
The only journeyman that comes to mind is Julius Francis - he accepts pay days just to give up-and-coming fighters some round experience, and doesn't even try to win. He's only won 2 out of his last 16 bouts. Yet he used to be British & Commonwealth champ.
But is a journeyman necessarily a bad thing? Not every fighter is going to have the talent to reach world class level - if a fighter enters the sport as a profession just to make money at, say, British or European level, is that a bad thing?
People call Danny Williams a journeyman, but his attention has always been to get to the top - so is it an ability or intention thing?
The only journeyman that comes to mind is Julius Francis - he accepts pay days just to give up-and-coming fighters some round experience, and doesn't even try to win. He's only won 2 out of his last 16 bouts. Yet he used to be British & Commonwealth champ.
Comment