Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: Charlo-Castano Had Fair Result, One of The Best Fights in Years

[CPNUTKnockoutFreshMart]

Suliaman is a con artist , all of these sanctioning body bozos are.

[MrShakeAndBake]

117-111 Thats a paid off judge score card right there...

[_Rexy_]

This isn’t right. This wasn’t a draw as in judges scored it even, it was a SD draw with a scorecard that defies any logic.

If you think the fight is even, I disagree but ok. However this fight ended in a draw because one judge had such an egregiously corrupt scorecard that it feels like this was a setup all along.

How the President of a sanctioning body can be ok when a judge scores a fight in such a corrupt and incorrect way is beyond comprehension.

He should be more upset than any fan and should be using the power of his office to suspend and punish Vazquez and make an immediate rematch to help return credibility to the sport.

The argument all over Social Media (That I'm really trying hard to ignore) is that there's zero difference between a 117-111 Charlo card and a 115-113 Charlo card. This is how this **** continues week by week.

[champion4ever]

As a collective; I believe that the judges got it right this time. The fight was a razor close thin fight. I wouldn't have had a problem with the fight going either way. It was just how close that fight was. Either guy could have won or lost it in my judgement but a Draw was fair.

The only judge who Castano winning the fight; Only had him doing so by one 1 point. Even Steve Farhood scored the fight a Draw. I trust his scorecards a lot more than I trust Mike Coppinger's scorecards or whoever that guy is that does the unofficial scoring for DAZN.

[Bronx2245]

As a collective; I believe that the judges got it right this time. The fight was a razor close thin fight. I wouldn't have had a problem with the fight going either way. It was just how close that fight was. Either guy could have won or lost it in my judgement but a Draw was fair.

The only judge who Castano winning the fight; Only had him doing so by one 1 point. Even Steve Farhood scored the fight a Draw. I trust his scorecards a lot more than I trust Mike Coppinger's scorecards or whoever that guy is that does the unofficial scoring for DAZN.

i agree with you and Steve Farhood! The problem was Nelson Vasquez's score, which was pathetic! That one bad apple did spoil the whole bunch! I thought Charlo won 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12. So easily I could see how a judge could find another round, to make it six! Nelson Vasquez should never be allowed to judge another fight!

[The Big Dunn]

The argument all over Social Media (That I'm really trying hard to ignore) is that there's zero difference between a 117-111 Charlo card and a 115-113 Charlo card. This is how this **** continues week by week.

That makes no sense. Well, unless the point is each card is equally putrid and corrupt because Castano clearly won then ok I buy it . LOL.

otherwise the people arguing that are f-cking really dumb.

[PRmagnum]

You are corrupt, Castaño won and that’s why boxing is slowly dying because of this crap

[_Rexy_]

That makes no sense. Well, unless the point is each card is equally putrid and corrupt because Castano clearly won then ok I buy it . LOL.

otherwise the people arguing that are f-cking really dumb.

They're saying "Its a draw regardless of if they gave Charlo 12-0 or 7-5, so who cares?" So in other words, **** accountability.


And yeah, Agreed. I had it 8-4 BCC

[The Big Dunn]

They're saying "Its a draw regardless of if they gave Charlo 12-0 or 7-5, so who cares?" So in other words, **** accountability.


And yeah, Agreed. I had it 8-4 BCC

To me that is such BS. IMO, huge difference between a draw- 2 or more judges scoring a fight 6-6 or a 115-113 either way and one judge scoring a draw- then a SD draw with a corrupt scorecard that brings into question the integrity of the sport.

[The Big Dunn]

i agree with you and Steve Farhood! The problem was Nelson Vasquez's score, which was pathetic! That one bad apple did spoil the whole bunch! I thought Charlo won 2, 9, 10, 11, and 12. So easily I could see how a judge could find another round, to make it six! Nelson Vasquez should never be allowed to judge another fight!

The problem here is Farhood’s draw is like Ward’s draw on Loma/Lopez.

They scored the fight a draw for the preferred network fighter in fights the majority of fans thought ( based on social media info) that the non preferred fighter won clearly. It makes me wonder if they were told to do that from higher up.

Farhood and Ward are knowledgeable pros but those cards make me question their integrity and independence.

I think it is a huge conflict of interest to have network employed experts doing the unofficial scoring.