This sport sucks
Collapse
-
I had Castano winning but even the 10-8 round is acceptable.And for people saying a draw is fair, I saw 4 maybe 5 rounds for Charlo. You'd have to be biased to see 6 and there is simply no argument for more than 6. So in a scenario with 3 judges, no way should 2 of them both have the absolute max 6 rounds for Charlo (which it's very debatable whether you can even find 6 rounds). But not only that, one judge found 9 rounds for Charlo in one of the most awful cards of the decade, while another found 6 and the other found 5 AND gave Charlo a 10-8 rd. Yet, almost all observers had a minimum of 7 rounds for Castano while many had 8 or 9, but not ONE of the "professional" judges gave more than 6 to Castano. Pure and utter horse**** and it happens every ****ing week in this sport
Just not the bogus scorecard.Last edited by ShoulderRoll; 07-18-2021, 12:30 AM.Comment
-
the judge was scared of being called racist if he didnt score it for charlo. its that simple. charlo doesnt make enough money for PBC to care about bribes.Comment
-
I'd be fine with draws in close fights if there was some consistency in the scorecards, but it always seems to be two reasonable scorecards and then one blind crackhead scorecard like tonight. We had that in Mayweather-Canelo, Canelo-GGG 1, Fury-Wilder 1, and now this. It just keeps happening over and over and I feel like nothing would be done about it at this point even if something could be done about itComment
-
agreed 100%. made worse by the fact i stayed up until 5am to watch it and even posted before hand that Castano would win and they would rob him & he could only win if he won 10+clear rounds.
im like an abuse victim, i know whats going to happen but i still watch it.Comment
-
-
The issue is. When a relative unknown does well everyone gives him every single round. This is the case of that.Comment
Comment