Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why do some people pretend anyone at HW could beat Wilder?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by tonysoprano View Post

    Casual.

    Fury is garbage. You think a guy that went life and death with Otto Wallin, was flattened by nobodies like Steve Cunningham and Neven Pajkic could compete against a truly great HW. No chance. It's a piss-poor era for the division and this chancer has taken advantage of that and casuals like yourself.

    If this is the 70's he doesn't even get anywhere near a title shot. He's a bum. Lewis, Holyfield, Bowe and prime Tyson would **** him up for fun. Holmes boxes his socks off..he's garbage.
    You want to be smart, but you are casual.

    Mike Tyson was knocked out by bums. Lewis was knocked out by Rahman. Holyfield has like 10 losses? Yo are really casual if you think they would stand a chance against Fury.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post

      After getting outboxed for 9 rounds. If Szpilka avoided that shot like he did for the previous 9 rounds he'd have won. Any top 30 boxer has a great shot at beating Wilder if they make it all 12. He's that ****ing bad.
      Yeah, I agree, but he can also knock out anybody. Thing is, guys can`t just avoid it. Wilder still finds the way to land it, nearly always.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post

        You want to be smart, but you are casual.

        Mike Tyson was knocked out by bums. Lewis was knocked out by Rahman. Holyfield has like 10 losses? Yo are really casual if you think they would stand a chance against Fury.
        Rahman beats everybody Fury ever fought apart from Klitschko including Wilder. Holyfield is unquestioned as an ATG anybody that knows boxing knows it. If Cunninhgham and Pajkic who are straight garbage can flatten Fury what do you think a Foreman or Liston would do to him. They would demolish him. Wilder is a bum-killer who never fought a single elite HW so beating him means nothing to me.

        Your problem is YDKSAB boxing. No serious judges even consider Fury on the level of others because his CV is total garbage. He hasn't even fought the best Heavyweight in the UK (AJ) let alone any other top HW's.

        Keep getting conned like the other mugs.
        Last edited by tonysoprano; 07-19-2021, 11:32 AM.

        Comment


        • #44
          ''Any top 30 boxer has a great shot at beating Wilder if they make it all 12.'' That is a big IF.
          None of the top 30 HWs today have a great chin or defense.

          I think its more than a fair assumption to say he will land at some point as we've seen many times and virtually all times they can't take his power.

          And as terrible as his boxing ability is its probably not much if any worse than a lot of these other HWs. They're all flawed too ****.

          I won't ever say it was a masterclass but his boxing ability in Stiverne 1 was probably better than a lot of these other HWs. I can't think of Dillian Whyte for example ever putting on such a display tbh
          I think he is a horrible boxer also. Its why I'd like to see him fight Wilder I think they share a lot of the same pros and cons.
          -Kev- -Kev- tonysoprano tonysoprano like this.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post

            You want to be smart, but you are casual.

            Mike Tyson was knocked out by bums. Lewis was knocked out by Rahman. Holyfield has like 10 losses? Yo are really casual if you think they would stand a chance against Fury.
            A lot of the bums from the 90s heavyweights would be top 10 or even champs today.

            Tua
            Oquendo
            Maskaev
            Rahman
            Mccall
            Ibeabuchi
            Ruiz
            Izonritei
            Moorer

            They had power and skill all of them

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post

              A lot of the bums from the 90s heavyweights would be top 10 or even champs today.

              Tua
              Oquendo
              Maskaev
              Rahman
              Mccall
              Ibeabuchi
              Ruiz
              Izonritei
              Moorer

              They had power and skill all of them
              Corrie sanders who was a part time boxer and ktfo prime wlad

              Would give all these 2020 guys hell with his power and left hand
              billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

              Comment


              • #47
                https://*************/watch?v=QysfCHcgraI

                2 guys from the 90s that never even won a title

                Watch how these 2 fight

                The chin

                The power

                The stamina

                Watch these 2 and tell me they weren't better than the scrubs today
                billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by tonysoprano View Post

                  Rahman beats everybody Fury ever fought apart from Klitschko including Wilder. Holyfield is unquestioned as an ATG anybody that knows boxing knows it. If Cunninhgham and Pajkic who are straight garbage can flatten Fury what do you think a Foreman or Liston would do to him. They would demolish him. Wilder is a bum-killer who never fought a single elite HW so beating him means nothing to me.

                  Your problem is YDKSAB boxing. No serious judges even consider Fury on the level of others because his CV is total garbage. He hasn't even fought the best Heavyweight in the UK (AJ) let alone any other top HW's.

                  Keep getting conned like the other mugs.
                  Let the Cunningham and Pajkic thing go, Fury was not even top 20/30 in the world at that time, and was fighting at domestic level. He was hardly the same guy that beat Wlad. That version of Fury facing 2015 Wlad, would have been smashed out inside 1 round.
                  JakeTheBoxer JakeTheBoxer likes this.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by medic5678 View Post
                    Generally speaking, once a guy gets beaten like that, other fighters learn to adapt. Now Wilder knows he can lose. If he keeps fighting, you will see other fighters beating him. Similar to what happened with Tyson. Wilder's cherry has been popped. When he fights Fury again, he's in for a total humiliation. I personally think he's going to have some sort of mental breakdown.
                    what a very uninformed statement from a casual with limited knowledge

                    After Tyson got ktfo

                    He murdered everyone not named holyfield or Lennox, bud

                    Tyson lost to buster Douglas in 1990

                    he didn't lose to anyone not named holyfield or Lennox Lewis until 2004

                    When he was almost 40 yrs old after 19 yrs in boxing

                    ruddock, Bruno, seldon, botha, golota, Etienne, etc.

                    All solid guys, Tyson beat all of them and kod most

                    37 yr old past it Tyson sparked out Clifford Etienne in 1 punch

                    Ppl were saying it was a dive

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post

                      After getting outboxed for 9 rounds. If Szpilka avoided that shot like he did for the previous 9 rounds he'd have won. Any top 30 boxer has a great shot at beating Wilder if they make it all 12. He's that ****ing bad.
                      Like I said before, you can’t make this up.

                      If Wilder had not punched Szpilka in the face with a hard punch, ending the fight, Wilder would have lost.

                      No sh.t. It’s called boxing. You can only score/win by punching your opponent.

                      If one of your punches make your opponent unable to participate, you win.

                      If you outbox me for the majority of our fight, in multiple fights, but in those multiple fights I win by KO’ing you every time, i’m better than you. Because there’s one way I can beat you and I get my way. If there is only one way I can beat you, and I always get it my way and beat you the way I can beat you. I’m better. If the only way you can beat me is by outboxing me for 12 rounds and avoid getting hit, tough luck. Boxing is about hitting, punching your opponent. The odds are against you, not me. The probability of not getting hit with a power punch (non jab) at least once in a fight? You probably have a better chance at winning the lottery.

                      It’s amusing when fans argue “but without the KO doe!”.

                      In the battlefield, you’re in a shootout. You’re losing. Outgunned. But your countrymen save you by dropping bombs on the enemy. The enemy would’ve won without those bombs being dropped. Well, no sh.t Sherlock. It’s war. Guns will be used, bombs will be dropped. If you win despite your enemy being smarter than you, but you overpowered your enemy. It doesn’t matter. If the outcome is always that you overpower your enemy, and your enemy can’t do anything but run/avoid you, then…lol. Think for a moment.

                      Wilder wins his fights by KO’ing his opponents. Without KO’ing his opponents, he would lose. Well damn, some great potential analysts here.


                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP