Why do some people pretend anyone at HW could beat Wilder?

[JakeTheBoxer]

Casual.

Fury is garbage. You think a guy that went life and death with Otto Wallin, was flattened by nobodies like Steve Cunningham and Neven Pajkic could compete against a truly great HW. No chance. It's a piss-poor era for the division and this chancer has taken advantage of that and casuals like yourself.

If this is the 70's he doesn't even get anywhere near a title shot. He's a bum. Lewis, Holyfield, Bowe and prime Tyson would **** him up for fun. Holmes boxes his socks off..he's garbage.

You want to be smart, but you are casual.

Mike Tyson was knocked out by bums. Lewis was knocked out by Rahman. Holyfield has like 10 losses? Yo are really casual if you think they would stand a chance against Fury.

[JakeTheBoxer]

After getting outboxed for 9 rounds. If Szpilka avoided that shot like he did for the previous 9 rounds he'd have won. Any top 30 boxer has a great shot at beating Wilder if they make it all 12. He's that ****ing bad.

Yeah, I agree, but he can also knock out anybody. Thing is, guys can`t just avoid it. Wilder still finds the way to land it, nearly always.

[tonysoprano]

You want to be smart, but you are casual.

Mike Tyson was knocked out by bums. Lewis was knocked out by Rahman. Holyfield has like 10 losses? Yo are really casual if you think they would stand a chance against Fury.

Rahman beats everybody Fury ever fought apart from Klitschko including Wilder. Holyfield is unquestioned as an ATG anybody that knows boxing knows it. If Cunninhgham and Pajkic who are straight garbage can flatten Fury what do you think a Foreman or Liston would do to him. They would demolish him. Wilder is a bum-killer who never fought a single elite HW so beating him means nothing to me.

Your problem is YDKSAB boxing. No serious judges even consider Fury on the level of others because his CV is total garbage. He hasn't even fought the best Heavyweight in the UK (AJ) let alone any other top HW's.

Keep getting conned like the other mugs.

[dan_cov]

''Any top 30 boxer has a great shot at beating Wilder if they make it all 12.'' That is a big IF.
None of the top 30 HWs today have a great chin or defense.

I think its more than a fair assumption to say he will land at some point as we've seen many times and virtually all times they can't take his power.

And as terrible as his boxing ability is its probably not much if any worse than a lot of these other HWs. They're all flawed too ****.

I won't ever say it was a masterclass but his boxing ability in Stiverne 1 was probably better than a lot of these other HWs. I can't think of Dillian Whyte for example ever putting on such a display tbh
I think he is a horrible boxer also. Its why I'd like to see him fight Wilder I think they share a lot of the same pros and cons.

[Left Hook Tua]

You want to be smart, but you are casual.

Mike Tyson was knocked out by bums. Lewis was knocked out by Rahman. Holyfield has like 10 losses? Yo are really casual if you think they would stand a chance against Fury.

A lot of the bums from the 90s heavyweights would be top 10 or even champs today.

Tua
Oquendo
Maskaev
Rahman
Mccall
Ibeabuchi
Ruiz
Izonritei
Moorer

They had power and skill all of them

[Left Hook Tua]

A lot of the bums from the 90s heavyweights would be top 10 or even champs today.

Tua
Oquendo
Maskaev
Rahman
Mccall
Ibeabuchi
Ruiz
Izonritei
Moorer

They had power and skill all of them

Corrie sanders who was a part time boxer and ktfo prime wlad

Would give all these 2020 guys hell with his power and left hand

[Left Hook Tua]

https://*************/watch?v=QysfCHcgraI

2 guys from the 90s that never even won a title

Watch how these 2 fight

The chin

The power

The stamina

Watch these 2 and tell me they weren't better than the scrubs today

[Nash out]

Rahman beats everybody Fury ever fought apart from Klitschko including Wilder. Holyfield is unquestioned as an ATG anybody that knows boxing knows it. If Cunninhgham and Pajkic who are straight garbage can flatten Fury what do you think a Foreman or Liston would do to him. They would demolish him. Wilder is a bum-killer who never fought a single elite HW so beating him means nothing to me.

Your problem is YDKSAB boxing. No serious judges even consider Fury on the level of others because his CV is total garbage. He hasn't even fought the best Heavyweight in the UK (AJ) let alone any other top HW's.

Keep getting conned like the other mugs.

Let the Cunningham and Pajkic thing go, Fury was not even top 20/30 in the world at that time, and was fighting at domestic level. He was hardly the same guy that beat Wlad. That version of Fury facing 2015 Wlad, would have been smashed out inside 1 round.

[Left Hook Tua]

Generally speaking, once a guy gets beaten like that, other fighters learn to adapt. Now Wilder knows he can lose. If he keeps fighting, you will see other fighters beating him. Similar to what happened with Tyson. Wilder's cherry has been popped. When he fights Fury again, he's in for a total humiliation. I personally think he's going to have some sort of mental breakdown.

what a very uninformed statement from a casual with limited knowledge

After Tyson got ktfo

He murdered everyone not named holyfield or Lennox, bud

Tyson lost to buster Douglas in 1990

he didn't lose to anyone not named holyfield or Lennox Lewis until 2004

When he was almost 40 yrs old after 19 yrs in boxing

ruddock, Bruno, seldon, botha, golota, Etienne, etc.

All solid guys, Tyson beat all of them and kod most

37 yr old past it Tyson sparked out Clifford Etienne in 1 punch

Ppl were saying it was a dive

[-Kev-]

After getting outboxed for 9 rounds. If Szpilka avoided that shot like he did for the previous 9 rounds he'd have won. Any top 30 boxer has a great shot at beating Wilder if they make it all 12. He's that ****ing bad.

Like I said before, you can’t make this up.

If Wilder had not punched Szpilka in the face with a hard punch, ending the fight, Wilder would have lost.

No sh.t. It’s called boxing. You can only score/win by punching your opponent.

If one of your punches make your opponent unable to participate, you win.

If you outbox me for the majority of our fight, in multiple fights, but in those multiple fights I win by KO’ing you every time, i’m better than you. Because there’s one way I can beat you and I get my way. If there is only one way I can beat you, and I always get it my way and beat you the way I can beat you. I’m better. If the only way you can beat me is by outboxing me for 12 rounds and avoid getting hit, tough luck. Boxing is about hitting, punching your opponent. The odds are against you, not me. The probability of not getting hit with a power punch (non jab) at least once in a fight? You probably have a better chance at winning the lottery.

It’s amusing when fans argue “but without the KO doe!”.

In the battlefield, you’re in a shootout. You’re losing. Outgunned. But your countrymen save you by dropping bombs on the enemy. The enemy would’ve won without those bombs being dropped. Well, no sh.t Sherlock. It’s war. Guns will be used, bombs will be dropped. If you win despite your enemy being smarter than you, but you overpowered your enemy. It doesn’t matter. If the outcome is always that you overpower your enemy, and your enemy can’t do anything but run/avoid you, then…lol. Think for a moment.

Wilder wins his fights by KO’ing his opponents. Without KO’ing his opponents, he would lose. Well damn, some great potential analysts here.