Comments Thread For: Fury-Wilder III: Mike Ortega To Serve As Referee For Heavyweight Trilogy Bout
Collapse
-
-
Fury did not want the third fight as he felt he won the initial fight and then literally beat Wilder from ring post to ring post in their rematch, and as such Wilder was not worthy of a third fight (especially with the myriad of insulting excuses that Wilder spouted off following the rematch loss); however, if Wilder knocks out Fury on the 24th, Fury will want a rematch more than any other fight if only for redemption but also to prove that Wilder's win was a fluke. As for Wilder signing for a fourth fight, having done what many considered the impossible with a K.O. of Fury, Wilder would want the opportunity to do it again and prove that the K.O. was no fluke and establish dominance forever. So yes, a fourth fight without a doubt. And just to be clear, not for a second would I believe that Fury ends his career with a K.O. defeat at the hands of Wilder.
Wilder says he wants to retire Fury. Again, after KO'ing the dude, you think he'll fight him again, just to talk sh.it, and build up a new fight?
Where you been? Wilder had to take Fury to court to get him to honor a rematch. If he ko's him, why give Fury, who many people think beat him twice, another shot?
You guys make no damn sense.
Fury gets knocked out and retires. Wilder has to badger AJ for another year or 2, before he and Hearn decide to finally drop balls, and make undisputed.Comment
-
That's his palm you can see, not his fist.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Again, get your facts straight. Wilder was silent because the networks had already decided they didn't want the fight until February. Bob Arum even stated as much. Stop acting like Wilder was silent because he didn't want the fight. You dudes are delusional.———
This is how lies get propagated. Wilder was silent up until Fury signed a deal to face AJ.
Two, other than the delusional Wilder fans, nobody wants to see Fury destroy Wilder again. Fury vs AJ was the biggest fight to make until the looney Wilder decided it was time to get beat up again
Comment
-
Yes, the glove does not look right; regardless, Wilder had better be prepared for anything Fury (literally) throws at him on the twenty-fourth as he cannot count on the ref to control Fury (at least not until the damage is already done). Plus, either Wilder badly damages Fury round one, or he'll never have a chance to win.Comment
-
Wilder definitely has to make it a fight from the first round on. Unfortunately I think wilder is his own worst enemy in fighting lazy and I think he goes back to that wait to throw a right hand and give away rounds. That is literally the worst style flaw I have ever seen at that level
Yes, the glove does not look right; regardless, Wilder had better be prepared for anything Fury (literally) throws at him on the twenty-fourth as he cannot count on the ref to control Fury (at least not until the damage is already done). Plus, either Wilder badly damages Fury round one, or he'll never have a chance to win.Comment
-
————Why would I want to do that when I know that he is going to get his asswhooped and knocked the fuck out in this trilogy bout this time? However, in any case, if Fury could prove that he could fight with no deception or subterfuge involved on a fair, even and level playing field then you got a deal! You got it?
Do you respond just to respond or did you actually read what I wrote?
These were your words
“Fury won't be able to cheat this time with his gloves. They are going to be fully vetted and examined by Team Wilder and the commission.”
And this is what I wrote
”it’s going to be an even playing field because of all the scrutiny and extra watch kept in place by Wilder.
And then I reiterated this, literally asking you not to bring it up again
“And yes, it will be on an even playing field so no need to ask that question.”
There is is literally no reason, none whatsoever for you to keep repeating (while still suggesting) that Fury will cheat. We’ve already established that Wilder’s team has taken extra precautions (per your own words) so why do you keep on with the “fair and even playing field”? We already know it’s going to be in place.Comment
Comment