Comments Thread For: Canelo Spurns Golovkin Again, Prefers To Fight Charlo

[aboutfkntime]

Or could it be that all u nelo nut huggers are actually the casuals, it would make way more sense, don't u think? Seen as though most analyst's and boxing journalists saw it the way I did, second fight was close I'll give u that, at a stretch u could have called it a draw but a nelo win makes u a s**t scorer of fights fwend

for the first fight, in FIVE of those rounds... ALL THREE JUDGES awarded those 5 rounds to Canelo... but you shltheads insist that Hypekin won that fight easy LMAO


boxingscene scored that fight a draw... YES, the first fight... as did MANY other news outlets


Canelo easily won the rematch... Jabkin could not get his game going at all, just like Abel Sanchez admitted






...

[I have no ears]

for the first fight, in FIVE of those rounds... ALL THREE JUDGES awarded those 5 rounds to Canelo... but you shltheads insist that Hypekin won that fight easy LMAO


boxingscene scored that fight a draw... YES, the first fight... as did MANY other news outlets


Canelo easily won the rematch... Jabkin could not get his game going at all, just like Abel Sanchez admitted






...

He did win the fight easily, are u seriously suggesting nelo doesn't have an advantage from dodgy scoring? It's happened his whole career, u can't use "the judges scored it that way so it must be true" angle cos he's got so many unfair calls in his favour in his career that it's not even a good argument to make, like i said, nelo is a great fighter, probably pound for pound at this point but the fact remains he didn't win any fight legitimately against golovkin so the best thing to do for his legacy is go out there and smash him in a trilogy and put the rivalry to bed for good but he won't and it's gonna leave a permanent question mark on his career unfortunately

[Lance98]

I am so done with ggg and canelo fighting each other. Canelo has ggg figured out, and ggg is afraid to engage and stand in front of canelo. The fight will be the same old fight, and we already know what to expect. I thought that canelo cleared any doubts from the first fight by beating ggg soundly and put an end to any trilogy. It does not make any sense anymore. I rather see canelo fight jermall, benavidez, plant, beterbiev or bivol.

[aboutfkntime]

He did win the fight easily, are u seriously suggesting nelo doesn't have an advantage from dodgy scoring? It's happened his whole career, u can't use "the judges scored it that way so it must be true" angle cos he's got so many unfair calls in his favour in his career that it's not even a good argument to make, like i said, nelo is a great fighter, probably pound for pound at this point but the fact remains he didn't win any fight legitimately against golovkin so the best thing to do for his legacy is go out there and smash him in a trilogy and put the rivalry to bed for good but he won't and it's gonna leave a permanent question mark on his career unfortunately

I am suggesting that you are just another silly casual-fan who has never laced em up in his life

FACT: in FIVE of those rounds... ALL THREE JUDGES awarded those 5 rounds to Canelo

no matter how much you casual-fans whine and cry about professional judges, they know a LOT more about this game than you do

they are professionally trained, knowledgeable, and they are ringside... you are none of those things

FACT: boxingscene.com, along with a number of other websites that commentate on boxing, scored that fight a draw

the "Golovkin won easy" thing... is just casual-fan nonsense that has been parroted from idiot-to-idiot since that fight

repeating nonsense... does not make it true

here is the thing, and this is why we know you casuals are idiots who only watch one fighter during a bout... the 5 rounds mentioned above that were ALL scored for Canelo, they were WIDE rounds... FACT: Canelo CLEARLY won those rounds, and he won them easy... Golovkin got a boxing lesson... and the other 7 rounds, most of which were won by Golovkin, were VERY close, VERY difficult to score, and more than 1 could have gone either way

the "Golovkin won easy" line, is utter nonsense... when we hear that line, we know that we are talking to a casual






...

[I have no ears]

I am suggesting that you are just another silly casual-fan who has never laced em up in his life

FACT: in FIVE of those rounds... ALL THREE JUDGES awarded those 5 rounds to Canelo

no matter how much you casual-fans whine and cry about professional judges, they know a LOT more about this game than you do

they are professionally trained, knowledgeable, and they are ringside... you are none of those things

FACT: boxingscene.com, along with a number of other websites that commentate on boxing, scored that fight a draw

the "Golovkin won easy" thing... is just casual-fan nonsense that has been parroted from idiot-to-idiot since that fight

repeating nonsense... does not make it true

here is the thing, and this is why we know you casuals are idiots who only watch one fighter during a bout... the 5 rounds mentioned above that were ALL scored for Canelo, they were WIDE rounds... FACT: Canelo CLEARLY won those rounds, and he won them easy... Golovkin got a boxing lesson... and the other 7 rounds, most of which were won by Golovkin, were VERY close, VERY difficult to score, and more than 1 could have gone either way

the "Golovkin won easy" line, is utter nonsense... when we hear that line, we know that we are talking to a casual






...

You're seriously suggesting Adelaide Byrd knows how to score a fight? Wasn't she suspended after that bout?? U clearly are way too invested in nelo to see sense, but there's a lot of u about so it's not surprising. And boxingscene are also known to have some weird cards aswell, scoring is subjective, yes, but also nut huggers like u seem to score it only for their favourite boxers. And don't act like you're some ex amateur boxer, your a pizza delivery guy with too much time on there hands

[aboutfkntime]

He did win the fight easily, are u seriously suggesting nelo doesn't have an advantage from dodgy scoring? It's happened his whole career, u can't use "the judges scored it that way so it must be true" angle cos he's got so many unfair calls in his favour in his career that it's not even a good argument to make, like i said, nelo is a great fighter, probably pound for pound at this point but the fact remains he didn't win any fight legitimately against golovkin so the best thing to do for his legacy is go out there and smash him in a trilogy and put the rivalry to bed for good but he won't and it's gonna leave a permanent question mark on his career unfortunately

I will address that comment in a different post... because, it is an entirely different issue

honestly dude, you sound like you were born yesterday, and have been watching boxing for 5 or 6 minutes

let me paint a picture for you...


Golovkin

1) Golovkin talked utter garbage for YEARS about " anyone from 154-168 "... but, when it came time to step up, he killed FOUR huge fights over weight

he lied to his idiot fans... and unbelievably, half of those muppets not only still support him, they make excuses for him LMAO... wtf?

2) despite campaigning at middleweight his whole career... Golovkin did not become undisputed, and he STILL does not have a signature win or career-defining fight... wtf???

3) his resume, for a supposed killer, can be accurately described using one word... POOR... his second-best win is David-fkn-Lemieux... let that sink in

Canelo

1) is a 4 division champion... has won MANY world titles... will fight anyone... and his legacy is not only MUCH bigger than Golovkin's, it is significantly improving fight-by-fight


despite those facts being well-known, and undeniable... YOU think that Canelo will have a permanent question mark over his career, and are willing to give Hypekin a total free pass for under-performing in his biggest fights and falling WAY short of expectations

kid, Canelo may have question marks, but Golovkin has HUGE black marks over his career, and some of them are downright embarrassing

not only do I disagee with EVERYTHING you just said, the opposite is true LMAO

you casual-fans get it horribly bent... I would love to see you walk up to a trainer and blurt out that nonsense... better yet, copy/paste the post above into a e-mail and send it to breadman edwards... or, shall I do that for you?






...

[aboutfkntime]

You're seriously suggesting Adelaide Byrd knows how to score a fight? Wasn't she suspended after that bout?? U clearly are way too invested in nelo to see sense, but there's a lot of u about so it's not surprising. And boxingscene are also known to have some weird cards aswell, scoring is subjected, yes, but also nut huggers like u seem to score it only for their favourite boxers. And don't act like you're some ex amateur boxer, your a pizza delivery guy with too much time on there hands

I boxed for years kid... you watched a few fights and fell in love with a hypejob... BIG DIFFERENCE

you actually sound like one of them silly pac-tards

Hypekin fell WAY short of expectations... stop blaming Canelo for that you dumbass, and start developing an actual love for the sport instead of falling in live with the latest hypejob

criticizing Canelo, while praising Hypekin... is re-tarded






...

[I have no ears]

I will address that comment in a different post... because, it is an entirely different issue

honestly dude, you sound like you were born yesterday, and have been watching boxing for 5 or 6 minutes

let me paint a picture for you...


Golovkin

1) Golovkin talked utter garbage for YEARS about " anyone from 154-168 "... but, when it came time to step up, he killed FOUR huge fights over weight

he lied to his idiot fans... and unbelievably, half of those muppets not only still support him, they make excuses for him LMAO... wtf?

2) despite campaigning at middleweight his whole career... Golovkin did not become undisputed, and he STILL does not have a signature win or career-defining fight... wtf???

3) his resume, for a supposed killer, can be accurately described using one word... POOR... his second-best win is David-fkn-Lemieux... let that sink in

Canelo

1) is a 4 division champion... has won MANY world titles... will fight anyone... and his legacy is not only MUCH bigger than Golovkin's, it is significantly improving fight-by-fight


despite those facts being well-known, and undeniable... YOU think that Canelo will have a permanent question mark over his career, and are willing to give Hypekin a total free pass for under-performing in his biggest fights and falling WAY short of expectations

kid, Canelo may have question marks, but Golovkin has HUGE black marks over his career, and some of them are downright embarrassing

not only do I disagee with EVERYTHING you just said, the opposite is true LMAO

you casual-fans get it horribly bent... I would love to see you walk up to a trainer and blurt out that nonsense... better yet, copy/paste the post above into a e-mail and send it to breadman edwards... or, shall I do that for you?






...

You're painting me as a Golovkin fan when that is far from the truth, I'm a boxing fan who's been watching boxing since the Nigel benn days so probably when u were in nappies bruh, I never denied that golovkin had question marks on his career, I said canelo does and as he's having an ATG sorta career right now having that blot on his resume and having many boxing analysts and observers thinking he didn't win either of those fights then it would be in his best interests to take the trilogy, kid.

[I have no ears]

I boxed for years kid... you watched a few fights and fell in love with a hypejob... BIG DIFFERENCE

you actually sound like one of them silly pac-tards

Hypekin fell WAY short of expectations... stop blaming Canelo for that you dumbass, and start developing an actual love for the sport instead of falling in live with the latest hypejob

criticizing Canelo, while praising Hypekin... is re-tarded






...

"I boxed for years kid" he says as he furiously types on a keyboard resting on his 300lb stomach in his basement, as I said, I've been watching boxing since the late 80s early 90, and been an avid fan since and I know for a fact both those fights were rigged in nelos favour, the fact u can't see it show's your a nelo nug hugger, u and 7 Mexican dudes are the only people that believe that nelo won any of those fights

[I have no ears]

I boxed for years kid... you watched a few fights and fell in love with a hypejob... BIG DIFFERENCE

you actually sound like one of them silly pac-tards

Hypekin fell WAY short of expectations... stop blaming Canelo for that you dumbass, and start developing an actual love for the sport instead of falling in live with the latest hypejob

criticizing Canelo, while praising Hypekin... is re-tarded






...

And at what point did I praise Golovkin? Now you're just making s**t up cos again your way to invested in nelo. Golovkins nowhere near my favourite fighter, and he never will be, and I was routing for nelo in the first until that utterly atrocious judging made me route for Golovkin in the second. Out of the two of them though I find nelo a way better watch and I've stated many times nelo would win the trilogy at this point, so all your points are clearly from an emotional standpoint and that's when your s**t fall apart. I've never been one to score a fight for someone I like better, if that was the case chisora would only have 3 losses right now, I score fights round by round on clean punch output, aggression and effective defense not by who I like best u fkn child