Comments Thread For: Canelo Spurns Golovkin Again, Prefers To Fight Charlo

[Madison Boxing]

By "his niche" do you mean to say "reigning world champions?" Check Canelo's resume then compare it to any other active fighter not named Manny Pacquiao and see how it rates.

his resume looks great on paper but most were washed up or had looked like crap in their recent fight. most were there to pick up a pay day and go a few rounds, nothing more nothing less

[NachoMan]

Eh, that's a bit of a stretch.

Is it? Name an active fighter besides Manny Pacquiao who has a better resume than Canelo. Take your time.

[AKAcronym]

Is it? Name an active fighter besides Manny Pacquiao who has a better resume than Canelo. Take your time.

That wasn't the argument the guy was making. I wouldn't consider the guys he beat at 168 "reigning champions."

[LAchargers373]

GGG is so lame. Szermeta then murata now he should get a crack at canelo again? Smh. Charlo and golovkin should fight they’re in the same division. And lil g refused to move up for a ward fight too. He’s a cherry picker

[NachoMan]

That wasn't the argument the guy was making. I wouldn't consider the guys he beat at 168 "reigning champions."

So it doesn’t really matter what the f**k you think, does it? Canelo has the second best résumé in all of boxing. I asked you and the other guy to challenge that fact by presenting an alternative but you can’t, Manny Pacquiao fought 22 world champions so far. Canelo has fought 19. If Canelo is such a poser, what fighter out there has achieved more? Again, take your time.

[TinAgeOfBoxing]

By "his niche" do you mean to say "reigning world champions?" Check Canelo's resume then compare it to any other active fighter not named Manny Pacquiao and see how it rates.

Canelo fights offer these bums enough money to sell there belts and end there careers. Saunders who clenelo just fought is the perfect example. Wimpy ret-ard Saunders ducked Golovkin and every other top fighter at 160 168 for many years because the lotto ticket KTFO into retirement paycheck was not big enough. Saunders would have lost to Callum Smith Andrade Golovkin Benavidez. Everyone calls out Pac and clenelo because of the money.

[AKAcronym]

So it doesn’t really matter what the f**k you think, does it? Canelo has the second best résumé in all of boxing. I asked you and the other guy to challenge that fact by presenting an alternative but you can’t, Manny Pacquiao fought 22 world champions so far. Canelo has fought 19. If Canelo is such a poser, what fighter out there has achieved more? Again, take your time.

What the **** are you going on about? I never argued against his achievements or his resume, only your assertion that the guys at 168 were 'reigning champions." And to your point, beating a champion doesn't necessarily make that fighter out to be better than someone who doesn't hold the title. Plenty of guys are "world champions" that really didn't do much to get the belt, but that's not the conversation.

[NachoMan]

What the **** are you going on about? I never argued against his achievements or his resume, only your assertion that the guys at 168 were 'reigning champions." And to your point, beating a champion doesn't necessarily make that fighter out to be better than someone who doesn't hold the title. Plenty of guys are "world champions" that really didn't do much to get the belt, but that's not the conversation.

What is the conversation exactly - in your mind? I never said anything about 168 pounds. I simply said the Canelo’s résumé is chock-full of world champions. Everything is relative, so you can argue all you want about your estimation of the quality of the champions Canelo has beaten, but you cannot come up with another fighter who comes close to Canelo's level of performance except the aforementioned Manny Pacquiao. If there is a more accomplished fighter in the game right now name him or shut the f**k up.

[AKAcronym]

What is the conversation exactly - in your mind? I never said anything about 168 pounds. I simply said the Canelo’s résumé is chock-full of world champions. Everything is relative, so you can argue all you want about your estimation of their quality of those champions but you cannot come up with another fighter who comes close to Canellos level of performance except the aforementioned Manny Pacquiao. If there is a more accomplished fighter in the game right now name him or shut the f**k up.

The guy...who you quoted...mentioned 168, to which you replied 'reigning champions." And once again, I never argued against his resume soo...congratulations? You beat me on a point that I never even made.

[NachoMan]

The guy...who you quoted...mentioned 168, to which you replied 'reigning champions." And once again, I never argued against his resume soo...congratulations? You beat me on a point that I never even made.

No, kid, you beat yourself...once again. It's what happens when your reasoning is flawed.