It was a close fight, however no way Oscar beat Floyd in that fight.
Comments Thread For: De La Hoya Still Feels He Beat Mayweather in 2007, Says Rematch Would Be Huge
Collapse
-
-
Watch the fight closely. And you’ll realize Floyd beats any version of Oscar
simply put Floyd too smart. Yes Oscar would have his moments. But they would spend most the fight playing Floyd’s game like they did in the actual fight
Floyd made Oscar follow him around
why would you bet on a guy who so and so in his big fights vs one the hardest fighters to beat in boxing historyComment
-
De la Hoya was an alcoholic and drug addict during his camp for Floid. The true Oscar would’ve won that fight with Mayweather winning 3-4 rounds the most. Too bad drugs, alcohol, and ghey sex ruined DLHComment
-
Why the **** do boxers live in the past ? Doesn’t happen in any other sport , quite bizarre and pointless , I mean what’s the point of 2 old fellas trying to knock **** out of each other?Comment
-
——————
Oscar was 34 and Floyd was 30 when they fought, how was he old?
Floyd was 38 and Manny was 36 when they fought, but somehow Manny was past his prime?
Oscar was 27 and 30 when he lost to Mosley, was it old age that got him beat?
Lastly, which young Oscar would have beaten Floyd? A young Oscar got beat by Tito and twice by Mosley and even Hopkins. So which “young” Oscar would have beaten Floyd?
By the time he was a PROFESSIONAL he was already OLD. OSCAR was past his prime beyond 140. I know it’s hard for young people to understand but one day YOU WILL.Comment
-
So, basically, the moment Oscar moved to 147 he was “old”. Oscar moved to 147 in 1997 at 24 years old and beat a bunch of guys before losing to Tito, yet he was old at 24.
Using your logic, Lomachenko with his extensive amateur background and two Olympic gold medals was old and past his prime when he turned pro at 25.
But your last line is what proves you don’t know what you’re talking about - “I know it’s hard for young people” … you don’t know me but you assume things about me.Comment
-
———-
So, basically, the moment Oscar moved to 147 he was “old”. Oscar moved to 147 in 1997 at 24 years old and beat a bunch of guys before losing to Tito, yet he was old at 24.
Using your logic, Lomachenko with his extensive amateur background and two Olympic gold medals was old and past his prime when he turned pro at 25.
But your last line is what proves you don’t know what you’re talking about - “I know it’s hard for young people” … you don’t know me but you assume things about me.Comment
Comment