Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

People say Tank is not a 3 division champ due to the WBA"regular" title

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by kafkod View Post

    But one had a Regular title because he was denied a chance to fight for the Super title, which didn't even exist when he became the Interim champion.

    The other made no attempt to fight for the Super title, and targetted the regular champ instead. Are you really saying that makes no difference?
    I'm saying it's the belt both held. No 3 division champion, no 20 defenses.

    Comment


    • #42
      Counts for Golovkin but not Tank because I like Golovkin more than I like Tank.

      Comment


      • #43
        How'd i know this crackhead was gonna bring up ggg? LMao

        Comment


        • #44
          The WBA "regular" is not a real belt and shouldn't count in the record books for Gervonta, for Golovkin, or for Canelo.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
            Counts for Golovkin but not Tank because I like Golovkin more than I like Tank.
            There are people trying to find creative ways to say this in this thread.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
              The WBA "regular" is not a real belt and shouldn't count in the record books for Gervonta, for Golovkin, or for Canelo.
              yeah when they handed tank the 'belt' he should have grabbed it, spat on it, threw it to the floor and then stamped on it

              Comment


              • #47
                So who held the other belt when Golovkin held tanks version of it?

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by DaNeutral. View Post
                  So who held the other belt when Golovkin held tanks version of it?
                  Felix Sturm.
                  Last edited by ShoulderRoll; 06-30-2021, 10:06 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    You can't be a champion in a division that's ruled by an undisputed champion without beating the undisputed champion. Tank has only really won a real title from Pedraza.
                    charliepaerker charliepaerker likes this.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                      The WBA "regular" is not a real belt and shouldn't count in the record books for Gervonta, for Golovkin, or for Canelo.
                      Should it count for Kessler or LHW Hopkins? Should it have counted for Maidana or Hatton? Should it count for poor Artem Dalakian?

                      I say it should count as long as there ain't an incumbent Super (or 'unified' as they've sometimes called it over the years) Champion. Basically the highest ranked of the multiple WBA champs (Super > Unified > World) is the one that should be considered 'the' WBA Champ at any given time.

                      Ain't really figured out how to deal with the WBCs franchise bull**** yet though, cos that's another type of ****** again.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP