Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Mayweather-Paul, Fury-Wilder 3, Pacquiao-Spence

[FLY TY]

To all the idiots in the comments above me, this guy has forgotten more about boxing than any of you will ever know. It's also funny, the ones who complain about someone speaking on race, usually can't stand it, because they are deep down racists.

I don't agree with a lot of things Breadman says, but it doesn't make them false. He was asked a question, gave facts, gave his opinion, and gave specific events to back up his opinions. He also never accused anyone of anything. He also addressed misconceptions such as commissions being present, ruling out cheating. He actually pointed to specific occasions where they were present, and things went on that weren't supposed to! I found it interesting.

Because someone says something you don't agree with, or that doesn't suit your beliefs, they become laughable, and a race-baiter.

The comments I've read in this mailbag say a lot more about you clowns, than the author.

[FannonOG]

Breadman knows what's up.

[Doubledagger]

About race and Wilder's excuses: I think Breadman's response was a very calculated one, and I think I understand why. Race is hot right now and a lot of people are malicious in their efforts to turn everything into racial thing. Like: "if it bleeds it leads", race sells. We are all human, we have prejudices, likes and dislikes, and generally we're nationalistic. All of that comes out in minor and not so minor ways, and Breadman knows this and he pointing it out very well. It is what it is. Breadman's comments about the water and gloves are curious. I guess if we were in a courtroom one could make the arguments Breadman did, that anything is possible. After all it's possible the sun won't come up tomorrow. But, like Occom's Razor we have to use our common sense. One question I do want to ask Breadman is this: Do you believe Mark Breland is the type of person who would spike his fighter's, in this case Deontay's, water? and the egg weights in his gloves, come on man. So on this one I think Breadman is wrong to cosign Wilder's outrageous claims.

If you lack reading comprehension just say so.

Bread was adressing every scenario in a general and isolated manner.

He didn't cosign anything Wilder said.

This is in fact how court cases are adressed by judges.

Whenever you read a case you will find there are four or five issues of dispute and the judge will first adress each issue seperately before coming to an overall conclusion.

Bread adressed each issue seperately, onlu difference is that he didn’t come to an overall conclusion.

Of course this is probably a bad example now that I think about because most likely you are American and there yawl have a jury and I have no idea how the decision making process goes with juries.

[Gamboal00]

Too many dumb ass Fury fans in the comments, like the only reason they really like the guy is bcause he's white, as it sure aint for his lying, cheating, low-life character. Do one and dont come back you pansies!

[ShoulderRoll]

Wilder made way too many excuses and never once pointed the finger at himself for the loss. To me thats the sign of a delusional person that's not being honest with himself.

Also, the fact that Mark Breland got fired but Jay Deeznutz got to stay tells me that Breland wasn't a yes man.

[Roadblock]

Good response Bread! People are taking the exhibition fight way too seriously!

Only because it involves Floyd, anybody else and it would slide under the rug.

[aboutfkntime]

To all the idiots in the comments above me, this guy has forgotten more about boxing than any of you will ever know. It's also funny, the ones who complain about someone speaking on race, usually can't stand it, because they are deep down racists.

I don't agree with a lot of things Breadman says, but it doesn't make them false. He was asked a question, gave facts, gave his opinion, and gave specific events to back up his opinions. He also never accused anyone of anything. He also addressed misconceptions such as commissions being present, ruling out cheating. He actually pointed to specific occasions where they were present, and things went on that weren't supposed to! I found it interesting.

Because someone says something you don't agree with, or that doesn't suit your beliefs, they become laughable, and a race-baiter.

The comments I've read in this mailbag say a lot more about you clowns, than the author.

good post man !

[aboutfkntime]

If you lack reading comprehension just say so.

Bread was adressing every scenario in a general and isolated manner.

He didn't cosign anything Wilder said.

This is in fact how court cases are adressed by judges.

Whenever you read a case you will find there are four or five issues of dispute and the judge will first adress each issue seperately before coming to an overall conclusion.

Bread adressed each issue seperately, onlu difference is that he didn’t come to an overall conclusion.

Of course this is probably a bad example now that I think about because most likely you are American and there yawl have a jury and I have no idea how the decision making process goes with juries.

another good post

personally I think the glove-loading accusation is ridiculous... but bread did make some fair points

and you're right, bread did not co-sign anything Wilder said... posters are just being bltches as usual







...

[aboutfkntime]

Wilder made way too many excuses and never once pointed the finger at himself for the loss. To me thats the sign of a delusional person that's not being honest with himself.

Also, the fact that Mark Breland got fired but Jay Deeznutz got to stay tells me that Breland wasn't a yes man.

thats the point right there

the only real factual comment in this article, or thread... that I can co-sign 100%





...

[Bronx2245]

Only because it involves Floyd, anybody else and it would slide under the rug.

That may be true, but I think there's too much paranoia over exhibitions, and their popularity! The whole Boxing industry is in panic mode!