Which Boxer Has The Worst Fanboys?

[iamboxing]

For me it's Mike Tyson. I don't mean people who admire his boxing, he's one one of my favourites. I mean the fans who think anything Tyson says is deep and profound, they're annoying as fck especially on YouTube. He says some dumb **** and I loathe his hotbox series or whatever its called where they gather around, get high and act like they're unravelling the mysteries of the universe.

Also, why I find Joe Rogan's podcast overrated with his pseudo-intellectual, druggy tripe - it's not entertaining or informative in the slightest. Give me an old Opie and Anthony or Patrice O Neal clip over Rogan's entire collection any day.

[Pac=Duran]

Wilder lol totally delusional.

[ShaneMosleySr]

Canelo and all of Great Britain.

[Robbie Barrett]

Pacquiao fans. According to them he's a natural featherweight still, #1 ATG and every fight he's lost was a robbery.

[Smash]

do people name fans of fighters from the country they are from i wonder

[KingOfGlory]

Casual fans are generally the worst. The type who think Ali would crush today's fighters or that a 50 year old Tyson could come out of retirement and be competitive against any top 10 heavyweight.

Pacquiao fanboys were the worst. Canelo fanboys take the title presently. Which is a shame since both are incredible fighters.

[War Room]

Canelostans by far beat the Pact@rds.

[Fists_of_Fury]

48ers, Clenelotards and Crawtards are all dumb and delusional **** riding fangimps. Hard to say which of the 3 are worse. There were more fanatical 48er fangimps though so they have to get my vote. From 06-09 they flooded every forum and comments section with their 3rd world rtardation.

[famicommander]

Easily Pacquiao fans. I don't think they even watch boxing outside of his fights. He's a god-emperor to these people even though in real life he's a scumbag politician.

[Marchegiano]

Every fanbase has these guys who believe or follow or agree with the **** their boxer says or does every single time, and, act like they're too ****** to understand why anyone would ever have any other take from the same events and information.