Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Spence Promises To "KO Pacquiao Into Retirement," Fight To Have VADA Testing, No Rematch Clause

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Barely beat Porter, cound't knock Porter out, couldn't knock Mikey out, couldnt knock Danny Garcia out. Spanks ain't knocking nobody out at the top.
    Spoon23 Spoon23 likes this.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Fighter78 View Post

      I think the main problem is that people are OVER estimating Errol Spence's abilities.....he's a very good young fighter and all but he's not some world beater....I think people are still living off of that Brook fight...when we ALL KNOW the brits seem to have a major problem with their fragile eye bones. Take that away...then who is the last good fighter that Errol Spence has stopped? I'll wait but I won't wait all year. I'm gonna enjoy manny's "surprise" "shocking" win.....tehe
      Guy Errald is 31 years old. He def aint young and hes not getting better. He looked just a BIT better than Danny Garcia which is never a good thing lol

      Spenser isnt 43 so hes already the favorite. He'll win from size and youth alone but it won't be dominating.

      Comment


      • #63
        This is great, Pacquiao bringing back respectability to boxing.
        blowblow blowblow likes this.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Oregonian View Post
          ——-

          And in the opposite argument, there people here who truly do not believe Manny has ever lost. Every loss is disputed or justified with these justifications
          - he had a shoulder injury
          - it was a lucky punch
          - Marquez was losing that fight until the KO
          - he got robbed
          - Manny win the rematch better
          - he refused to rematch Manny
          - Manny was a kid
          - Manny is 43 that’s why he lost to Spence.

          It’s the same mentality just on opposing sides
          That's fair. There are certainly a lot of excuses coming from the Pacquiao fan base. As a Pacquiao fan I did find the Horn and Bradley 1 losses highly questionable but it was what it was. They're in the record books as losses and nobody can change that.

          As for the Mayweather & Marquez 4 losses -- you will never hear an excuse for me on those. Mayweather won on the cards fair & square and I don't believe in "lucky" punches in boxing. So I tipped my hat to Marquez and give him 100% credit for that brutal KO.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Mike D View Post

            That's fair. There are certainly a lot of excuses coming from the Pacquiao fan base. As a Pacquiao fan I did find the Horn and Bradley 1 losses highly questionable but it was what it was. They're in the record books as losses and nobody can change that.

            As for the Mayweather & Marquez 4 losses -- you will never hear an excuse for me on those. Mayweather won on the cards fair & square and I don't believe in "lucky" punches in boxing. So I tipped my hat to Marquez and give him 100% credit for that brutal KO.
            Hey you sound like a reasonable Pac fan. I fw Pac too but I think Floyd is better. I know you're not the biggest fan of Pac but what makes you think his resume is better?

            Comment


            • #66
              Someone's drunk again.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by LeOoze View Post

                Hey you sound like a reasonable Pac fan. I fw Pac too but I think Floyd is better. I know you're not the biggest fan of Pac but what makes you think his resume is better?
                ask max kellerman.. he had an interview about that.. he said pac was the great p4p ahead of floyd.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Fighter78 View Post

                  Wow...you have to be one of the more dense people I've interacted with on this forum all day. Don't get salty at my comments...respond with some damn intellect and common sense....and common sense should tell you that Manny has more ways to win this fight then just by KO..(like Spence is some GD top of the world boxer LOL)..however...I know I'm not talking to an intelligent individual here so feel free to carry on with being ******. I don't usually converse with morons or fangirls so don't expect another response.

                  And you must be bi- polar judging from your previous comments.....please seek help. Morons
                  I agree Spence is basic but boxing is politics and black panther Haymon is HEAVILY invested in Charlo girls, Deyonce, and Erralda. REALLY need to BEAT them to get a win and a 43 year old Manny just isnt likely to win straight up (43 year old Manny probably wouldnt beat Thurman in a rematch tbh). When you consider black supremacists Haymon it is VERY UNLIKELY Manny can win a decision

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    I know people love these fighters but you have to understand aging is real...but props to Manny for taking this challenge

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by #1PaperChamp View Post

                      I agree Spence is basic but boxing is politics and black panther Haymon is HEAVILY invested in Charlo girls, Deyonce, and Erralda. REALLY need to BEAT them to get a win and a 43 year old Manny just isnt likely to win straight up (43 year old Manny probably wouldnt beat Thurman in a rematch tbh). When you consider black supremacists Haymon it is VERY UNLIKELY Manny can win a decision
                      why is Haymon a black supremist?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP