Do you still think "size means nothing" in a fight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Kev-
    this is boxing
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 39960
    • 5,045
    • 1,449
    • 234,543

    #41
    Originally posted by JasonBoxing

    So you are saying Prime Tyson could not KO Lebron James? That's weird dude. What about 'Midget' Wladimir at 240 pounds vs BIG SHOW at 350 pounds during his heaviest? You don't think Wlad could KO Big Show?

    What about Prime Lennox Lewis vs Shaq?
    Did you read any word I said?

    You said 160lb Hearns would KO a HW NFL player. My entire post from top to bottom was all about that one specific comment you made about Hearns.

    No where in my post did I speak of Mike Tyson vs Lebron James, or Wladimir Klitschko vs Big Show.

    My entire post was about boxing fans exaggerating the capabilities of pro boxers vs other much bigger athletes.

    Prime Tyson was about 220lbs or so. Lebron James is about 245lbs. That is not an unusual size for Tyson to fight. In fact he has KO’ed heavier opponents. So no, this is not about Tyson vs Lebron.

    And “so you are saying”, please read the posts and discuss what someone actually said.

    Comment

    • niceyboo3
      Go Cubs Go
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 2705
      • 505
      • 334
      • 24,035

      #42
      Originally posted by JasonBoxing
      So Logan Paul who outweight Floyd by 30 pounds lasted because of 'size'.
      Ok, so let's put some 250 Pound NBA Player against the 220 Pound Tyson that fought Spinks.. That 250 pound NBA player will last 12 rounds?
      None of them are manlets. Floyd is a manlet. Floyd is the size of Naomi Osaka

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP