I'm not even a big fan. But he's had a great career yet continues to fight against the top young champions. Win or lose that is something to be admired. Just like Hopkins competing against the likes of Calzaghe, Kovalev, and Dawson well into his 40s.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao is one of the few fighters who gets credit for losing
Collapse
-
-
people like you just dont get it huh?....pac at 43 is fighting the best and strongest ww ...floyd at 39 was fighting berto.....just pointing out the obvious why manny gets hell of a lot more credit than floyd!
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by danceswithfire View Postpeople like you just dont get it huh?....pac at 43 is fighting the best and strongest ww ...floyd at 39 was fighting berto.....just pointing out the obvious why manny gets hell of a lot more credit than floyd!
Berto > Rios, Algieri, Vargas, Lucas, Broner, Hatton, Clottyey, Horn, DLH..........
So I take it you can't won't answer the Q ?
Comment
-
-
One Pac fan, Spoony G, would rather have a discussion about what an old timer has to say in his YT video (presumably about May fans. I couldn't tell because the 1st 3min was him whining).
I asked Spoony about Pac's career and he deflected.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TernceBudCharlo View Post
He gets credit because we are in an era of boxing where all of the big names are terrified and won't fight young hungry lions like EJ. I gave Hopkins credit when he fought Kovalev even though he lost.
Originally posted by PeepeePoopooMan View Post
Yeah because beating froid would of made him great. Not his resume or overall career. No, he had to froid to be greatdumbass
Comment
Comment