Originally posted by Boxing-1013
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao is one of the few fighters who gets credit for losing
Collapse
-
Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post
Who had the better resume. Kirk or Ishida ?
And idk if you knew this - but Ishida KOed Kirkland. I just told you that but I know you're slow so you probably forgot. Ishida fought better top opponents, Kirkland has a win over Angulo. I think with the KO win, you'd have to be an idiot to take Kirkland over Ishida. But you're an idiot, so do you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post
Why are you comparing those two? That's like arguing Canelo's 10th best win is better than GGG's 15th best win, lol.
And idk if you knew this - but Ishida KOed Kirkland. I just told you that but I know you're slow so you probably forgot. Ishida fought better top opponents, Kirkland has a win over Angulo. I think with the KO win, you'd have to be an idiot to take Kirkland over Ishida. But you're an idiot, so do you.
Comment
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by PAC-BOY View PostHe gets credit because he faces adversity and doesn’t let a loss define him. Like most snowflakes do and would.
you didn’t see rocky..... it’s not about hard you hit it’s about hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post
I think GGG's is underrated, and Floyd's overrated, relatively speaking, yes.
But that has to do with the fact that I value good dominant wins over solid fighters in their primes/at their best weights, over wins over faded, past prime/shot guys fighting not at their best weight.
That's just how I look at fights. Nothing to do with GGG or Floyd specifically but yeah their resumes are a tale of two cities really.Boxing-1013 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Comment