Joshua ducked Fury and Wilder

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DaNeutral.
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2018
    • 10087
    • 1,665
    • 342
    • 144,794

    #21
    Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
    Joshua gave Wilder a terrible offer no one would take.

    Joshua turned down the biggest purse in heavyweight history to fight Wilder.

    Wilder and Fury actually fought each other and called out Joshua for ducking both of them after their fight.

    Wilder and Fury then fought each other again.

    The only time Joshua entered negotiations with either one was when he was well aware arbitration would prevent the fight from happening.

    Quack quack quack quack.

    Maybe he can fight a 45 year old, a 300-pounder or a crusierweight next. He loves those fights.
    lol we all know you don’t even believe that crap yourself and are just posting this type of thing cuz you buzz off your threads getting responses.

    Comment

    • KingGilgamesh
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2020
      • 1392
      • 524
      • 106
      • 8,713

      #22
      Originally posted by RightJabLikeZab

      If he only fought Breazale and Joshua once, he still would've made 60 million dolllars at that point with another fight worth 40 milllion with Joshua promised for later in 2020. If the 3rd didn't materialize he could've easily gotten out of the contract like Canelo did. Idk what's better. Making 60 mil through 3 fights, but being brutally stopped in the third and not fighting since, or making 60 mil in 2 fights with a 3rd guaranteed for $40 million, regardless when it happens.
      How would he have fought Joshua if Joshua lost to Ruiz about two months later???

      You speak as if litigation is just some sure fire thing as if we didn't just see how idiotic this line of thinking is. How can you sit there praising the money made from a contract when that same organisation literally just had a former party sue to get out of that same contract???

      The takes on here are ****ing shocking at times...

      Comment

      • KingGilgamesh
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2020
        • 1392
        • 524
        • 106
        • 8,713

        #23
        Originally posted by Jax teller

        Are you dumb?

        You should google 'the wealth googleable' information.

        Skipper only said they should have approached Haymon differently and formed a relationship first it wasn't a comment about the deal and that's not even a reasonable excuse from Wilders team tbh.

        Wilder himself said it was a better deal than the one for the Fury.

        You're a damn imbecile claiming the fights wouldn't have been necessarily been against AJ at 40 mil a piece when this wasn't a problem for Wilders team at the time.

        Pretty blatant you got some goofy agenda.
        You're trying to convince someone about a deal in which the very person who put together said deal said was "put together poorly". Honestly, you're another bumlicking idiot. No point wasting my time with another Joshua/Hearn cuckold.

        Wilder said he would have earned more money in that deal, not that it was better. Quite franky though, I still think Wilder is a bit plonker who puts his pride before common sense and (as I mentioned) was rightly talked out of that deal by Haymon. Joshua lost to Ruiz and there was no way he would have earned that money, would have had to find a way to litigate an escape from said contract and would have ruined his longterm relationship with Haymon and Showtime...the very thing John Skipper mentioned when speaking in hindsight.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP