Comments Thread For: Spence Pursuit Will End Pacquiao's Career On a Painful Note

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PeepeePoopooMan
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2021
    • 4326
    • 1,139
    • 1,459
    • 15,253

    #111
    Originally posted by just the facts

    You should have been born twins, no one person should have to be that dumb all by themself.
    Yeah thats what i thought. Moron

    Comment

    • Spoon23
      INVINCIBLE
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 20624
      • 922
      • 904
      • 107,969

      #112
      Originally posted by FLY TY

      Again, I don't know how much simpler I can say it. We have tale of the tapes for every damn fight. So you're telling me the bigger guy with the longer reach wins every time???

      Just about everybody Paquiao has fought, including Keith Thurman at WW has been bigger than him. It's never been an excuse until now. I don't know what else needs to be said.
      I don't know how much simpler I can explain to you. Analyst and fight prediction are made by factoring in the tale of tape. Meaning size and reach advantage as factors to consider.

      That said, as one poster pointed out. If Pac was the same size of Spence. This won't be a matchup at all. Pac will demolish Spence easy. That's just a fact.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #113
        Originally posted by Spoon23

        I don't know how much simpler I can explain to you. Analyst and fight prediction are made by factoring in the tale of tape. Meaning size and reach advantage as factors to consider.

        That said, as one poster pointed out. If Pac was the same size of Spence. This won't be a matchup at all. Pac will demolish Spence easy. That's just a fact.
        If Pac was the size of Spence he likely wouldn't have been as fast. You can's just imagine a blown up fighter and keep all his abilities. Doesn't work like that.

        Comment

        • P4Pdunny
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 8094
          • 143
          • 142
          • 58,715

          #114
          A last big fight and retirement package for Pac. Spence, at this stage is a bridge II far.

          Comment

          • TMLT87
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2020
            • 6204
            • 1,816
            • 896
            • 27,292

            #115
            Win or (probably) lose I do think this is very likely Pacs last fight. Its overdue but also kinda sad when you think about the gravity of it.

            Comment

            • FLY TY
              T.L.R.N.A.
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2008
              • 7514
              • 611
              • 377
              • 22,957

              #116
              Originally posted by PeepeePoopooMan

              So you really think his size wont be a factor? Smh spencer is bigger stronger younger and at this point maybe even faster than Pacquiao. He literally has every advantage. Fvkcin idiot
              According to you clowns, Spence is slow, flat-footed, and there to be hit. Pacquiao has better hand-speed, movement, and a hell of a lot more experience. There are advantages both ways. See the way boxing works, dummy?

              Again I agree, age isn't going to do him any favors though.

              Comment

              • FLY TY
                T.L.R.N.A.
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 7514
                • 611
                • 377
                • 22,957

                #117
                Originally posted by Spoon23

                I don't know how much simpler I can explain to you. Analyst and fight prediction are made by factoring in the tale of tape. Meaning size and reach advantage as factors to consider.

                That said, as one poster pointed out. If Pac was the same size of Spence. This won't be a matchup at all. Pac will demolish Spence easy. That's just a fact.
                Quick question, are size and reach the only factors when analyzing a fight, or are there other factors as well?

                Let you tell it, the taller guy with the longer reach wins every fight.

                Comment

                • FLY TY
                  T.L.R.N.A.
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 7514
                  • 611
                  • 377
                  • 22,957

                  #118
                  Originally posted by Robbie Barrett

                  If Pac was the size of Spence he likely wouldn't have been as fast. You can's just imagine a blown up fighter and keep all his abilities. Doesn't work like that.
                  You can't tell some of these guys anything...

                  Comment

                  • PeepeePoopooMan
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2021
                    • 4326
                    • 1,139
                    • 1,459
                    • 15,253

                    #119
                    Originally posted by FLY TY

                    According to you clowns, Spence is slow, flat-footed, and there to be hit. Pacquiao has better hand-speed, movement, and a hell of a lot more experience. There are advantages both ways. See the way boxing works, dummy?

                    Again I agree, age isn't going to do him any favors though.
                    Please quote me where I've said that about spencer. I think hes overrated as hell but hes still a good fighter. Everything is in spencers favor. Dont understand why your so hurt

                    Comment

                    • GucciGod
                      D.Roy
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Jan 2021
                      • 605
                      • 238
                      • 790
                      • 1,609

                      #120
                      Originally posted by Kagami Taiga

                      Thurman wasn't a consensus anything lol. He was prob at the tail end of the top 5. His showing before the Pac fight was also terrible. Thurman hadn't looked good in years going into that fight.
                      Still waiting on that list of fighters who were above Thurman at time he fought pac. You drooling dummy. Typical troll. Clueless once faced with a decent question, have to run and hide. You are a straight up f***ing idiot. Little weasel

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP