Floyd did say he will rematch Pacquiao Video evidence inside. So why fight Patsies instead Floyd?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spoon23
    INVINCIBLE
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 20624
    • 922
    • 904
    • 107,969

    #11
    Originally posted by Mmann2e

    Why should anyone care he's gone let him embarass himself if he'd like to why dream about unrealistic things? Why do you compare Pac and Floyd, you're not doing anything but showing you care more about Mayweather legacy than the man himself.
    Coz it's still a big fight. And Floyd did say he wants a rematch with Pacquiao. So as a man of integrity that I am. I think backing down and not being clear cut about it and using someone's name to make a quick buck is just someone who lacks integrity.

    And someone who loves the sport of boxing. Legacy trumps more than any dollars a fighter can have. And saying one thing and not doing it is a man without honor and should make anyone lose respect to any individual who claims he wishes to do.. That is a conman and has no business in any sport especially boxing.

    That said I'm not for a rematch. I'm just showcasing who is truly quacking here for so many years now.



    Comment

    • Spoon23
      INVINCIBLE
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 20624
      • 922
      • 904
      • 107,969

      #12
      Originally posted by hugh grant
      I so don't want Floyd to rematch pac. I d prefer floyd fight young undefeated superstars like pac.
      I don't want same situation where Pac kills himself and gets wear and tear fight young lion after young lion and Floyd gets whats left of pac. Pac does all the hard work, all the donkey work.
      Floyd has always did that. Pac kills himself against 3 of the greatest Mexican fighters of all time, fighting 9 times winning 7 of them, and Floyd just fights pac, rather than get involved down and dirty.
      Agree. The ship has sailed. Floyd is all bark and can't back up what he says. It only shows how much fear he has for a Pacquiao rematch. he knew a second rodeo will expose him. No amount of running and hugging will save him if a rematch happens. Floyd knows it. That's why he rather quack.

      Shows the lack of integrity he has for himself. A man who cares about circus shows than fight real fighters shows the amount of legacy he wants to give to the sport. As Pac has shown, only those who dare to be great and pushes themselves for legacy and honor are truly rewarded.

      The more Pac builds on his stellar resume.' The farther Floyd trails him.. It's just how the world works. The brave and the bold earns the most respect.

      Fighting cab drivers and youtubers and midgets in Japan for a cheap buck. Is what it is.. Cheap.

      Comment

      • Mmann2e
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Mar 2018
        • 357
        • 33
        • 36
        • 12,079

        #13
        Originally posted by Spoon23

        Coz it's still a big fight. And Floyd did say he wants a rematch with Pacquiao. So as a man of integrity that I am. I think backing down and not being clear cut about it and using someone's name to make a quick buck is just someone who lacks integrity.

        And someone who loves the sport of boxing. Legacy trumps more than any dolla*rs a fighter can have. And saying one thing and not doing it is a man without honor and should make anyone lose respect to any individual who can't back up what he says or wants to do.
        What's Floyd nickname, Money that's all he cares about which is the object of prizefighting. Two, it's not a big fight as the networks all know the snooze fest it was with so many wanting their money back. A rematch would be even more boring similar to Jones-Hopkins II which not only delayed but sabotaged younger fighters. You love the sport boxing, get hyped about fighters who matter today; Josh Taylor became undisputed yet can't get on Sky sports and ESPN definitely didn't promote his fight. Shows where boxing is when an undisputed champion barely gets noticed but some geriatrics are what these forums talk about.

        Comment

        • Spoon23
          INVINCIBLE
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 20624
          • 922
          • 904
          • 107,969

          #14
          Originally posted by Mmann2e

          What's Floyd nickname, Money that's all he cares about which is the object of prizefighting. Two, it's not a big fight as the networks all know the snooze fest it was with so many wanting their money back. A rematch would be even more boring similar to Jones-Hopkins II which not only delayed but sabotaged younger fighters. You love the sport boxing, get hyped about fighters who matter today; Josh Taylor became undisputed yet can't get on Sky sports and ESPN definitely didn't promote his fight. Shows where boxing is when an undisputed champion barely gets noticed but some geriatrics are what these forums talk about.
          That's not the point if it's going to be a borefest again.. The point is who is quacking.. The one who just barks and can't back it up all these years of marinating for a rematch.

          Great rivalries in the sport of boxing have rematches or even trilogies.. Floyd rather take the easy road. Why? Simple really.. FEAR.

          Well that's the thing. It's a free world. You can be a clown or you can be a gladiator. He chose to be a clown. That's on him. But don't tell me that's good for his legacy.

          Legacy is what you put on the work in your given sport. Legit challenges that builds on your career. Floyd choosing clowns over a fight with Manny is what it is.. A circus show.

          Floyd's own Coach/Uncle Roger knows there's unfinished business.. But he settled in a clown show.. It is what it is.. That's what he wants for his legacy. That's what he gets.



          Roger Mayweather: That would put him amongst the greatest fighters, but Floyd had a good, long legacy anyways. He will be amongst some of the greatest fighters but hes got to close the thing with Pacquiao before he ever does that, because thats one of the known guys that people respect and I think thats the guy that he's gonna have to beat or have to show something with.

          Even Roger Mayweather knows Floyd didn't conclude anything that night.


          Comment

          • Mmann2e
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Mar 2018
            • 357
            • 33
            • 36
            • 12,079

            #15
            Originally posted by Spoon23

            Well that's the thing. It's a free world. You can be a clown or you can be a gladiator. He chose to be a clown. That's on him. But don't tell me that's good for his legacy.

            Legacy is what you put on the work in your given sport. Legit challenges that builds on your career. Floyd choosing clowns over a fight with Manny is what it is.. A circus show.

            Floyd's own Coach/Uncle Roger knows there's unfinished business.. But he settled in a clown show.. It is what it is.. That's what he wants for his legacy. That's what he gets.



            Roger Mayweather: That would put him amongst the greatest fighters, but Floyd had a good, long legacy anyways. He will be amongst some of the greatest fighters but hes got to close the thing with Pacquiao before he ever does that, because thats one of the known guys that people respect and I think thats the guy that he's gonna have to beat or have to show something with.

            Even Roger Mayweather knows Floyd didn't conclude anything that night.


            Not to nitpick but correct me if I'm wrong didn't the majority here get upset at Wilder for firing Breland because Breland wouldn't let him go out on his shield? I just saying if its gladiator games you want then it should be fights to the death otherwise it's just playing as gladiators.
            To your Floyd comments again if he wants to be an idiot let him. No one considers these fights as legacy building and legacies are what our descendants will care depending on if such things make it to next generation. And in terms of right now if you consider the "legacy" tarnished ok; just seems you want to argue with Floyd fans who are satisfied with the end result of said fight.

            Comment

            • Spoon23
              INVINCIBLE
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 20624
              • 922
              • 904
              • 107,969

              #16
              Originally posted by Mmann2e

              Not to nitpick but correct me if I'm wrong didn't the majority here get upset at Wilder for firing Breland because Breland wouldn't let him go out on his shield? I just saying if its gladiator games you want then it should be fights to the death otherwise it's just playing as gladiators.
              To your Floyd comments again if he wants to be an idiot let him. No one considers these fights as legacy building and legacies are what our descendants will care depending on if such things make it to next generation. And in terms of right now if you consider the "legacy" tarnished ok; just seems you want to argue with Floyd fans who are satisfied with the end result of said fight.
              Well in any profession. You build on your career. The more you put on your work defines your legacy.

              That said. It's not the point if it's going to another borefest again.. The point is who said he wanted to fight and he ended up ducking Pacquiao again.. The one who just barks and can't back it up all these years of marinating for a rematch.

              It's as simple as that. That's how men handle there business. If you get in a bar fight. Let's settle it outside. But instead what Floyd did okay let's settle it outside.. But I won't be there for days and years.. Sorry to be blunt, but that's a pussay move brother.

              Great rivalries in the sport of boxing have rematches or even trilogies.. Floyd rather take the easy road. Why? Simple really.. FEAR.

              Pac had epic trilogies and rematches 2-3 even 4 times with Marquez. That's what legends of the sport do. Sadly Floyd just can't. That's just how he is built I guess. I'm just stating the obvious to those who can't see it.

              To be clearer when I meant about legacy. Is how you will be ranked before you leave the sport. Every sportsman has right to leave the sport when they choose to do so. That's where their legacy stops. Since Pac is still in the game. His legacy is still being written even more.

              Comment

              • Mmann2e
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Mar 2018
                • 357
                • 33
                • 36
                • 12,079

                #17
                Originally posted by Spoon23

                Well in any profession. You build on your career. The more you put on your work defines your legacy.

                That said. It's not the point if it's going to another borefest again.. The point is who said he wanted to fight and ended up ducking.. The one who just barks and can't back it up all these years of marinating for a rematch.

                It's as simple as that. That's how men handle there business. If you get in a bar fight. Let's settle it outside. But instead what Floyd did okay let's settle it outside.. But I won't be there for days and years.. Sorry to be blunt, but that's a pussay move brother.

                Great rivalries in the sport of boxing have rematches or even trilogies.. Floyd rather take the easy road. Why? Simple really.. FEAR.

                Pac had epic trilogies and rematches 2-3 even 4 times with Marquez. That's what legends of the sport do. Sadly Floyd just can't. That's just how he is built I guess. I'm just stating the obvious to those who can't see it.
                He didn't give De La Hoya a rematch why would Pacquiao be any different.

                Comment

                • Spoon23
                  INVINCIBLE
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 20624
                  • 922
                  • 904
                  • 107,969

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mmann2e

                  He didn't give De La Hoya a rematch why would Pacquiao be any different.
                  Dude, you do know DLH quit in his stool right? That's a nomas fight. Are you new in boxing??

                  Comment

                  • Mmann2e
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Mar 2018
                    • 357
                    • 33
                    • 36
                    • 12,079

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Spoon23

                    Dude, you do know DLH quit in his stool right? That's a nomas fight. Are you new in boxing??
                    De La Hoya quit on Floyd then they need to change the official result

                    Comment

                    • Spoon23
                      INVINCIBLE
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 20624
                      • 922
                      • 904
                      • 107,969

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Mmann2e

                      De La Hoya quit on Floyd then they need to change the official result
                      No he didn't. That was a 12 round fight.

                      Delahoya quit mid rounds against Pac. That's a white flag. That my friend is someone who knows he doesn't get a rematch.

                      And besides.. was Pac the one saying to the world. He is giving Floyd a rematch. Nope. Floyd said it to the world he wants a Pac rematch. And as the story goes duck his way to fighting noobs and cab drivers in exhibition match.. That's just how it is bud. Facts.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP