IMO Pac is taking Spence fight to make up for Mayweather loss

[TJ highway]

OMG enough of this Floyd vs Pac's chit.

Floyd retired remember....................................Or are you brain dead.

Pac's beat a 30 year old Thurman (Champion) and is set to fight a 31 year old Spence.

If Pac's wins OMG!.............................................. .What's next Crawford?

[hugh grant]

I wish Floyd wouldn't have fought berto And fought gg G instead because of what Pac is continuing to do. Because Pac was going to enhance his legacy after loss to floyd. Floyd kind of regressed backwards.
Time stands still for noone

[PRINCEKOOL]

It still won't make up for it.

But it is a good fight for him.

[djtmal]

He didn't want to take an ass whooping, that's why he didn't go all out even though he was obviously massively behind.

Yeah I thought his clinch count way behind Floyd's

[Stuntman Mike]

I wish Floyd wouldn't have fought berto And fought gg G instead because of what Pac is continuing to do. Because Pac was going to enhance his legacy after loss to floyd. Floyd kind of regressed backwards.
Time stands still for noone

BodyBagz but berto is an atg opponent, back me up here ballbag..

[Elotero]

Should have went out on his shield vs the real Mayweather instead. Jeff Horn GOAT.

[strykr619]

Set financially? Not from the reports. But it's your story, tell it anyway you want.

Considering he is in Politics and is set to run for President pretty obvious that type of info is designed to hurt him.

[Left Hook Tua]

OMG enough of this Floyd vs Pac's chit.

Floyd retired remember....................................Or are you brain dead.

Pac's beat a 30 year old Thurman (Champion) and is set to fight a 31 year old Spence.

If Pac's wins OMG!.............................................. .What's next Crawford?

Pac will fight Crawford if he beats spence

Now whether it happens or not I dunno

Politics

But we all know pac will fight

[Spoon23]

your eyes must not be working too well. thats a shame. braille keyboard? i salute your dedication. floyd easily won even though pac landed the much cleaner harder punches? it just doesnt add up and gives away your extreme bias. you cant easily win when one guy lands head rocking punches and all you land is a little grazing jab that doesn't move him one bit. floyds own corner said he was losing after 10 rounds so mathematically he couldn't win according to them. pretty silly really to try and pretend floyd put on some great boxing display in that fight. he didnt. ironically one of the reasons he didnt is because he was so entitled and knew people like you were out there and would pretend like he did even if he didnt! pac was clearly much better than he thought he would be and so he didnt take any risks and ran out the clock but the name of the game is clean punching and he lost that one by huge margins.

it is a bit strange seeing how many people think floyd won given his weak performance. i would have expected more of a split but i think the american commentating definitely influenced people as the commentators created a narrative of pac not being able to get to floyd(when thats not the point of boxing) the point is to land the better punches which he was doing so why would he have to "get to floyd" or "press the fight" so he was getting to floyd just not in the way they thought he would maidana style or something. very bizarre but thats why you see lots of foreign media who thought pac won and not as many american media. they were all watching through the same lens. really bad commentary and not an accurate depiction of what was happening in the fight from a clean punching stand point. they distracted people with "this is boring i guess floyd is winning" instead of breaking down that pac was making floyd hesitant to throw and picking him off with clean shots which is backed up with the video. floyd knows what happened in that ring cause he felt all of pacs shots and knew he was not connecting clean. thats why he avoided the rematch. i dont think grazing a guys nose with a tickle jab is going to make someone think they won a fight no matter how much of a narcissist they are.

Well said. tickle jabs don't really count in the pro scene. In the pros. It's not like the amatuers that you do love taps and its a point. In the pro scene, It's the hurt business. Floyd was tickling Pac with love taps. And as the story goes the biased home town gave it to Floyd. That says it all right there. Not to mention who was the true ring general, the effective aggressor who was consistently in the middle of the ring. That was Pac.. And as the facts have also shown. The one who landed the more punches and the cleaner punches, even if you count Floyd's tickle jabs was still Pac. And that's with a bad right shoulder. Imagine if that was a 100% Pac in there.

And if Floyd wasn't even sticking IVs in his system.. What will happen to Floyd against a healthy Pac.. It's mute and academic. That's why Floyd never came back for rematch even if he knows it's big money and for legacy.

Case closed.

[FLY TY]

Pacquiao is taking it because the McGregor fight fell apart and he's desperate for money. If McGregor didn't lose you'd be preparing to watch that. Stop the BS that he's doing it for legacy etc.

All facts. He took the Spence fight once McGregor lost, and Arum lied about paying him 40 mil for Crawford. Spence was his next option.

Want more proof? He wouldn't have sat and gotten stripped for his belt, is Spence was on the docket this whole time.

I usually don't agree with much you say, but you are absolutely correct in this instance.