Was Naseem Hamed really that good?

[New School]

Nope, another european/limey hypejob.

Crawled into a corner, cried, and disappeared the first time he actually fought a real man.

[WhoreUs]

Had Morales faced anyone with Naz's power?

pacquiao at 130 wasn't exactly paulie malignaggi you know.

his chin held up fine.

[studentofthegam]

****** question. Hamed was a beast. He broke in the era of big $ lil guys in boxing.

He hardly trained for the fight with Barrera, and was unmotivated. By that time Naz had made his money, and boxing was no longer a passion for him.

I'm not saying he would have beaten Barrera if his preperation for the fight was better, but with all his skill and physicial attributes, a well trained Naz is a formidable opponent.

Mangs come on man, a beast. The best victory he had was against an old Kevin Kelley. It relly hurts to hear you say that.
If he really wanted to put it on the line he was in a position to fight May. And timba, the fact that he didnt come prepared eliminates him from any atg votes. I thought he was entertaining but thats it. He was a real "runner" once he got hit. For anybody who ever gave Cotto, Pac or May any flac to say Naz is even relevant is contradictory and pretty sad.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

pacquiao at 130 wasn't exactly paulie malignaggi you know.

his chin held up fine.

He wasnt exactly Naz though

[WhoreUs]

He wasnt exactly Naz though

trust me.

erik could take naseem's punches.