Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was Naseem Hamed really that good?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    He was a clown in the ring. Power but no skill.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by miron_lang View Post
      A Very good fighter.

      Would definately lose to JMM and Morales.

      I think PAC kayoes him too.

      Mayweather would definately destroy him ala J. Chavez.

      I also think Linares outboxes or possibly kayoes him.

      Guzman Outboxes him.

      Good Chance againts Luevano, Guerrero, Katsidis or Juan Diaz
      Hamed was never hurt by any fighter, all and i do mean ALL his KD's where balance issues due to the way he avoided punches, nobody is going to KO him, certainly not Linares.

      MAB, Morales would UD him consistantly but he KO's Pac at FW Pac would have brawled with Hamed at that stage in his career and the last thing you do is exchange with Hamed.

      Freddie Roach perfected Pac beats him P4P, 126lb raw Pac loses

      Comment


      • #23
        Nas should never be mentioned int the same breathe as PAC, MAB, EM, or JMM... He looked great with sardine cans but once he stepped up, he got run out the sport...

        A fighter's greatness is measured by the level of competition he has faced as well as how he deals with adversity... On both counts NAZ has been found wanting...
        Last edited by nycbgdogg; 09-01-2009, 04:05 AM.

        Comment


        • #24
          He was a very good boxer but i dont think he wouldve trouble manny or erik sorry!!!

          Comment


          • #25
            People need to understand that styles make fights.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Tom Flores View Post

              and that all looked incredibly great against good competition,

              however, once he stepped it up and faced great competition,


              well, you know the rest.


              He was exciting to watch though and its a shame he didn't continue which is why I don't rank him all that great. He ran into a stumbling block and just flat out gave up without even trying again.
              He hardly trained for the fight with Barrera, and was unmotivated. By that time Naz had made his money, and boxing was no longer a passion for him.

              I'm not saying he would have beaten Barrera if his preperation for the fight was better, but with all his skill and physicial attributes, a well trained Naz is a formidable opponent.

              Comment


              • #27
                All flash and dazzle with alot going for him, when it came to digging deep after his lose, after his hands were hurting, he failed.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Naz was good and when watching him fight has an amateur you get to appreciate the little thing he did when he was like 12 years old. He just got paid too much money and he wasnt hungry anymore which got to him and made him relax.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    I actually think Hamed could of beaten both Morales and Marquez provided they did not KO him, which is a possibility.

                    Morales too easy to hit and too aggressive, Marquez's would not get up if he got dropped by Hamed.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Dynamite Kid View Post
                      I actually think Hamed could of beaten both Morales and Marquez provided they did not KO him, which is a possibility.

                      Morales too easy to hit and too aggressive, Marquez's would not get up if he got dropped by Hamed.
                      You got a lot of IFs going on , the only actual look in this class was Barrera and he made Naz look amateur , that bunch all kick his butt because they are all a class above .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP