Carl Froch: The ONLY One Who Could Give Canelo Problems Is Terence Crawford

[Combat Talk Radio]

Alright, NSB.

Here's your chance to be consistent.


We just had a thread about Crawford fighting Charlo at 154 - and NOBODY gives him a chance in hell.

Which means that nobody should give Crawford a chance against Canelo - since Canelo is a FAR superior fighter to Charlo.


Thoughts?

[dan_cov]

I think there are plenty that would give him problems and Crawford isn't one, he'd get swatted like a fly.

[LeOoze]

That cte that froch got from Ward must be marinating really good in his head right now

[tonysoprano]

Froch on a wind up as usual. He's quite a good troll always gets a few biters.

[STREET CLEANER]

That is ridiculous. They are too far apart in weight to even entertain a fight like that. What is Bud's best win?

[jmrf4435]

I think canelo would break his neck

[kushking]

Froch is like a shtcago politician,windier than boy Goerges dįckhole ridden underwear in a hurricane...

[Carpe Diem]

Canelo would definitely test that chin of his for sure. This would be the fight to make if Canelo could still make 154.

[rickJen]

Nobody really knows until they fought. It's not like
Carl Frampton is not a professional boxer, you can't even invoke YDKSAB here.
In the end,
It's all perception. Lots of boxing aficionados rate Crawford higher than most top fighters.
You can't change perception until he loses his next fight.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Nobody really knows until they fought. It's not like
Carl Frampton is not a professional boxer, you can't even invoke YDKSAB here.
In the end,
It's all perception. Lots of boxing aficionados rate Crawford higher than most top fighters.
You can't change perception until he loses his next fight.

Common sense applies.

If you don't believe Crawford beats Charlo, then you must not believe that Crawford beats Canelo, because we know that Canelo is a superior fighter to Jermell.