The more I think about it and his resume, I'm more and more convinced that Saunders is not as good as the general consensus seems to believe. Saunders is really living off that boxing lesson he put on Lemieux, but the rest of the resume is questionable when you look deeper and was beating Lemieux in that fashion all that impressive. Lemieux is obviously very dangerous, but I'd argue many boxer/movers could do the same thing to Lemieux. Hell, Lemieux was knocked down twice and taken to the brink by ****ing Maxim Bursak at 168. Saunders has been in a lot of close fights and could easily have a few losses.
Blackwell fight was competitive, Ryder and Eubank fights were VERY close, Andy Lee fight was very competitive, terrible showing against Akavov and looked ordinary against Monroe. More importantly imo, is that Saunders hasn't done anything impressive at 168 and has looked a lot worse than he ever did at 160 imo. Yeah, he washed an old, well past it Martin Murray recently, but he looked bland against a terrible guy in Isufi and was briefly hurt in that fight and was losing to Coceres until the late stoppage. I think the "rises to the occasion" narrative is overblown. Aside from Lemieux, his best wins were against Eubank and Ryder at the developing stage of their careers still, personally I would pick Ryder to beat him if they fought at 168 today. Perhaps I will be proven wrong on Saturday night, but I feel the feeling post fight will be that Saunders was not as good as we thought.
Blackwell fight was competitive, Ryder and Eubank fights were VERY close, Andy Lee fight was very competitive, terrible showing against Akavov and looked ordinary against Monroe. More importantly imo, is that Saunders hasn't done anything impressive at 168 and has looked a lot worse than he ever did at 160 imo. Yeah, he washed an old, well past it Martin Murray recently, but he looked bland against a terrible guy in Isufi and was briefly hurt in that fight and was losing to Coceres until the late stoppage. I think the "rises to the occasion" narrative is overblown. Aside from Lemieux, his best wins were against Eubank and Ryder at the developing stage of their careers still, personally I would pick Ryder to beat him if they fought at 168 today. Perhaps I will be proven wrong on Saturday night, but I feel the feeling post fight will be that Saunders was not as good as we thought.
Comment