Why Mayweather is the better boxer than Pac?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why Mayweather a better boxer than Pac when accomplishments wise goes to Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
-
Pacman hasn't accomplished more. You shouldn't get credit beating weight drained fighters and fighters coming off a loss.
-
Originally posted by whirlwind View PostWhy Mayweather is the better boxer than Pac?
Comment
-
There's no doubt that Mayweather is the better skilled fighter. Mayweather is probably the most skilled fighter ever but he hasn't accomplish much as a great. If you want to be consider a great, you have to be stepping it up in your 3-4th and above weight. Mayweather 1st and 2nd classes he prettey much fought the best but anything after that has been just for show. Pacquiao only weight class that you can prettey much say he didn't fight the best is 135.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chunk View PostBy using your eyes and watching both guys box. A blind man and his dog knows Mayweather's a better boxer then Pacquiao.
Comment
-
Originally posted by whirlwind View PostJust because Mayweather has a better defensive skills than Pac then he is the better boxer right? Then how about Pac's offensive skills better than Mayweather that finished Hatton and Oscar earlier? I think they are even in skills only in different ways.
Comment
-
Originally posted by whirlwind View PostComparing Pacman's skills to Gatti wont bring Pac where he is now.Originally posted by civicvx View PostEven if his level is on par with Gatti what matter is he kick ass. Floyd isn't doing much **** with his skill.
Comment
Comment