hahahahah joshua resume is aging like **** hahahah. Whyte koed by a 42 year old grandpa, parker needed a robbery against past prime chisora. ruiz in a 50/50 fight with 40 year old 220 lbs arreola hahahaha. Joshua is a bum and Fury will smash him to pieces.
You guys can't decide if it was a freak win for Andy or not. Either way hurts your argument. You've either got to give Joshua credit for a lopsided win in the rematch, or accept that it was a freak occurence that was promptly reversed.
Andy now has one of the best heavyweight resumes out there. Joshua, close with Parker, and Arreola. It's a better resume than Wilder, who Fury's post-2015 comeback resume is entirely built off.
hahahahah joshua resume is aging like **** hahahah. Whyte koed by a 42 year old grandpa, parker needed a robbery against past prime chisora. ruiz in a 50/50 fight with 40 year old 220 lbs arreola hahahaha. Joshua is a bum and Fury will smash him to pieces.
Chisora ko'd spiltka in 2...so these triangle theories don't work.
Joshuas resume is definitely better than Furys. Beating guys in the top 10 consistently is more impressive than having 1 signature win over wilder and fighting lower tier opposition or just not fighting at all (for years in Furys case)
As for Ruiz I think he was better than people thought pre AJ fight (I think he was ranked 14) but yes he can certainly be beaten by a number of fighters as was seen with Joseph Parker. Styles make fights and on that night Ruiz caught AJ with something and AJ didn't recover.
These kinds of upsets happen in heavyweight boxing especially in the super heavy era. No reason to overrate Ruiz one way or the other
if you watch soccer, a top team losing to a lesser team, just means they lost 'on the night' and doesn't mean the lesser team is superior. it just means they performed better on the day, or had more luck, or the top team was on bad form that night etc.
Comment