Buds paper belts on borrowed time. Bud will be FORCED to fight Ortiz next

[joseph5620]

The usual crybaby bs from Buds biggest apologist. Color me surprised......

Crawford & Hooker are comparable the same way any fighters are comparable. (I literally said Hookers like a bigger less skilled b version & that it has to do with being stablemates,they both switch hitters,they both have similar style ffs,but Crawford is smaller & hasn't faced remotely as good of comp as Hooker already has.

Somehow you took from that that I don't know boxing. Shows your blatant bias.

I'm not even a big fan of Crawford. But I am a fan of boxing that knows the sport. Which means I can see how moronic you are when you compare Crawford to Hooker. That's laughably ******. Nothing about their style or skills is similar.

[kushking]

I'm not even a big fan of Crawford not I am a boxing fan that knows the sport.. Which means I can see how moronic you are when you compare Crawford to Hooker. That's laughably ******.

Its fanboi ****** to pretend like you can't compare the 2 just because Hooker has been kod,I keep repeating that Hooker is a bigger worse version of Bud,how does that not compute in your feeble mind?

I've noticed you always think you know everything, everyone else is ******,blah blah

Look in the mirror arsshole,its you

[joseph5620]

Its fanboi ****** to pretend like you can't compare the 2 just because Hooker has been kod,I keep repeating that Hooker is a bigger worse version of Bud,how does that not compute in your feeble mind?

I've noticed you always think you know everything, everyone else is ******,blah blah

Look in the mirror arsshole,its you

You can't compare them because there is nothing comparable about them. Not skills, career, or style. You're just not intelligent enough to understand that. Your ignorance is comical.

[kushking]

You can't compare them because there is nothing comparable about them. Not skills, career, or style. You're just not intelligent enough to understand that. Your ignorance is comical.

Yes,the usual Micheal Jackson quote you're now famous for

"Everyone is ignowant" some nsb know it all mrneverworong joseph

they're styles are too comparable,(at least when they are in same stance)(they both switch hitters & train together & it shows,only difference is Buds a southpaw(but his southpaw style is often similar to Hookers),they are as close in style as anyone can be at same weightclasses & opposite preference.(but it shows in their backing up boxing strategy style.

[joseph5620]

Yes,the usual Micheal Jackson quote you're now famous for

"Everyone is ignowant" some nsb know it all mrneverworong joseph

they're styles are too comparable,(at least when they are in same stance)(they both switch hitters & train together & it shows,only difference is Buds a southpaw(but his southpaw style is often similar to Hookers),they are as close in style as anyone can be at same weightclasses & opposite preference.(but it shows in their backing up boxing strategy style.

Yeah Hooker and Crawford are comparable LOL. Keep lying to yourself about that to feel better about dic k riding Ortiz.

[pasawayako]

crawford should just reitre if he don't want to fight a live opponent.

[Satir]

peeps just continue throwing hurdles to Spence-Crawford unification, pathetic

[kushking]

Yeah Hooker and Crawford are comparable LOL. Keep lying to yourself about that to feel better about dic k riding Ortiz.

Youre the definition of a vicarious stan pretending to be a unbiased neutral despite proving daily youll defend your favorite duckers & start arguments about dumb sht that completely deflect whats actually important(you start arguing about my pov as a way to derail the facts being listed about Bud & that Ortiz will likely Hooker him too. (Regardless if hes way better than Maurice)


(whether I think 2 fighters w same trainer who are both switch hitters,are similar strategy wise,has nothing to do with the fact Bud is a average lil ww champ with a history of avoiding smoke because hes a glorified Omaha hypejob(hes good not great).(what does me thinking Ortiz beats Bud have to do with the fact Bud already dismissed the fight,& will now be forced to fight him?

You act as if I have to bash Bud to be a fan of Ortiz,Ortiz is coming for that smoke & Bud is going to have to fight him,thats all that matters,we shall see which of us is right(you have a history of being wrong)

Ps you dksab, otherwise you'd admit there's several similarities between Crawford & Hooker,Hooker just didn't duck fighters like Ortiz & Ramirez til age 33 & counting like Bud

At least Hooker didn't almost get dropped by kavaliausk c*****asdchn or whatever his name is. Hooker would look great fighting Jeff Horn,1 legged drive by victims etc.

[Combat Talk Radio]

peeps just continue throwing hurdles to Spence-Crawford unification, pathetic

The only "hurdle" was Crawford saying 50-50 won't work and it has to be 60-40 with 60 to him or no fight.

Or did you ignore that?

[Ray*]

peeps just continue throwing hurdles to Spence-Crawford unification, pathetic

It’s the American way....