Comments Thread For: Judging the Judges: Tony Harrison-Bryant Perrella Scorecard Analysis

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Judging the Judges: Tony Harrison-Bryant Perrella Scorecard Analysis

    Tony Harrison and Bryant Perrella did not make things easy on each other or the judges. A competitive and entertaining junior middleweight fight that could've gone either way on the scorecards ultimately did just that, with Harrison and Perrella fighting to a 12-round split decision draw. Harrison won by a score of 116-112 on the card of judge Max DeLuca, while Dr. Lou Moret had the contest 117-111 in favor of Perrella. A 114-114 verdict turned in by judge Zachary Young failed to split the difference in the Premier Boxing Champions (PBC) on Fox main event from Shrine Auditorium & Expo Hall in Los Angeles.
    [Click Here To Read More]
    Last edited by BIGPOPPAPUMP; 04-19-2021, 05:19 PM.
  • PBR Streetgang
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2016
    • 8292
    • 3,923
    • 2,159
    • 42,787

    #2
    Interesting that DeLuca scored the fight for Harrison and also had the Mielnicki/Martin fight a draw (favoring the work of the A-side), Moret on the other hand favored both Perrella and Martin.

    Looking through his historical fight scores, he consistently favors the A-side more than whoever else is judging that particular bout. No surprise but still terrible.

    Comment

    • STREET CLEANER
      The Watcher
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 19404
      • 4,685
      • 4,315
      • 298,225

      #3
      I gave Perella the nod but it was a close fight and a draw was not a bad decision.

      Comment

      • 57Blues
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2018
        • 2139
        • 751
        • 9
        • 12,593

        #4
        The fight was good, I had Goodfella winning close due to those punches he got hit with were not dangerous and Harrison looked a bit weaker then usual and did not take the fight to Parella. Still glad it was competitive all facts considered. Deluca does his name come up a lot on cards that are close or just a bit odd ? But neither fighter complained right ? I am sure Parella was glad he did not have the same Ref in the ring from his last fight. FOX got to start the sell on there PPV as is always the case.

        Comment

        • Wacked_Out
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2021
          • 1657
          • 608
          • 1,200
          • 1,725

          #5
          Same old crooked judges. I hear those names and I know whats up. Im going to start keeping a record of judges involved in bad decisions. Myself, I had Harrison winning by 2 rounds.

          Comment

          • shakedaddy
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 273
            • 163
            • 39
            • 8,048

            #6
            I'm just embarrassed for Boxing Scene that a professional columnist uses, "could have went" in an article.

            Comment

            • PBR Streetgang
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2016
              • 8292
              • 3,923
              • 2,159
              • 42,787

              #7
              Originally posted by STREET CLEANER
              I gave Perella the nod but it was a close fight and a draw was not a bad decision.
              Watching the fight, I admit I didn't score round by round, it "felt" like 7-5 Perrella or a draw and I'd be fine with 7-5 Harrison. When DeLuca's card was announced for Harrison, I remembered that he gave Mielnicki the draw (which I thought was unacceptable).

              Comment

              • War Room
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2014
                • 9296
                • 2,806
                • 662
                • 19,006

                #8
                Originally posted by Wacked_Out
                Same old crooked judges. I hear those names and I know whats up. Im going to start keeping a record of judges involved in bad decisions. Myself, I had Harrison winning by 2 rounds.
                If anybody had a fix in, it was for Harrison. You really really think a nobody had a fix in?

                Comment

                • Eff Pandas
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2012
                  • 52129
                  • 3,624
                  • 2,147
                  • 1,635,919

                  #9
                  Was there rbr numbers posted for this fight?

                  Comment

                  • just the facts
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 13788
                    • 2,436
                    • 1,021
                    • 88,113

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Wacked_Out
                    Same old crooked judges. I hear those names and I know whats up. Im going to start keeping a record of judges involved in bad decisions. Myself, I had Harrison winning by 2 rounds.
                    You thought Harrison won, almost everyone else says Perella but close. The judges scored a draw. What's crooked about that?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP