Why did Pacquiao fight Tim Bradley three times?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KillaMane26
    Big Boi Beezy
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2014
    • 16298
    • 2,565
    • 533
    • 174,475

    #11
    Top Rank had limited opponents so it made the most sense otherwise they wouldn't have wanted time settling an unofficial loss. Like Horn

    Comment

    • mxtali
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2017
      • 2145
      • 433
      • 986
      • 34,126

      #12
      Because bob had zero opponents left for manny. And he didn’t want to cough up the 20m pac wanted to fight bud

      Comment

      • BodyBagz
        The Stuff Of Nightmares
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2020
        • 29772
        • 6,045
        • 6,437
        • 108,454

        #13
        Pillow puncher who's also a righty.....

        It's called padding the resume.
        Horn didn't get a rematch so it couldn't be to right a robbery

        Comment

        • GrandpaBernard
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 17156
          • 4,480
          • 2,947
          • 114,399

          #14
          Giving Timmeh that gift the first time most pointless robbery in modern boxing

          without it they would have fought only twice

          anyways the 3rd match was because manny needed more practice before trying Floyd again

          Comment

          • pasawayako
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 15348
            • 639
            • 194
            • 151,963

            #15
            Floyd duck bradley that's why pac was obliged to fight bradley just like pac was obliged to fight the other fighter that floyd duck(thurman, margarito, spence)

            Comment

            • hugh grant
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 30628
              • 2,219
              • 940
              • 105,596

              #16
              It's great for Pac s legacy that in a trilogy you can beat Your big rival 3 times. Why didn't Floyd fight Bradley at least once is more confusing?
              1 win often do esnt mean much. Don't mean you'd win rematch let alone a third fight.
              Last edited by hugh grant; 06-25-2021, 04:59 AM.

              Comment

              • Thuglife Nelo
                Banned
                • Dec 2018
                • 26836
                • 1,299
                • 1,822
                • 654,176

                #17
                Originally posted by LeOoze
                I recently started watching boxing and I don't get why Pac fought Bradley a total of three times. Bradley was alright, not a bad boxer at all. He didn't really beat anybody great prior to fighting Pac, but regardless, they fought a total of 3 times? Why? Most people had Pac winning the first fight (I thought Pac won but it was close), and Pac again won decisively a second time. Why did they fight another time?

                Like can you imagine if Floyd fought maidana three times. Like what's the point
                Say it with me: “Filler Fights” (in-house) $$$$$

                Comment

                • Thuglife Nelo
                  Banned
                  • Dec 2018
                  • 26836
                  • 1,299
                  • 1,822
                  • 654,176

                  #18
                  Originally posted by mxtali
                  Because bob had zero opponents left for manny. And he didn’t want to cough up the 20m pac wanted to fight bud
                  If I recall Bradley was a mando to Floyd for the WBO. Floyd didn’t even bother and therefore Too Rank had dibs to make Bradley vs PAC. Mainly because Bradley has the right for the title shot. The WBO would bend over to a PAC money event

                  Comment

                  • djtmal
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 13267
                    • 1,323
                    • 11
                    • 39,097

                    #19
                    Originally posted by pasawayako
                    Floyd duck bradley that's why pac was obliged to fight bradley just like pac was obliged to fight the other fighter that floyd duck(thurman, margarito, spence)
                    Absolutely......

                    Comment

                    • New England
                      Strong champion.
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 37514
                      • 1,927
                      • 1,486
                      • 97,173

                      #20
                      Originally posted by LeOoze
                      I recently started watching boxing and I don't get why Pac fought Bradley a total of three times. Bradley was alright, not a bad boxer at all. He didn't really beat anybody great prior to fighting Pac, but regardless, they fought a total of 3 times? Why? Most people had Pac winning the first fight (I thought Pac won but it was close), and Pac again won decisively a second time. Why did they fight another time?

                      Like can you imagine if Floyd fought maidana three times. Like what's the point


                      if the second maidana fight was close floyd may well have fought him again. the first fight was very close.


                      regarding the pacquiao trilogy, arum didn't have a lot of other fighters in his stable and i think he fixed the first fight so a rematch and trilogy would be in order. first fight was... sort of close... maybe? if you can't score and you don't know what to look at and you hate manny pacquiao?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP