If Crawford beats Pac, Spence doesn’t deserve 50/50 for a unification
Collapse
-
-
What if PPV bombs though & Spence does higher numbers vs. talker Keith Thurman. Being serious DSG-Errol flopped yet isn't great sign for Pacquiao-Bud during COVIDComment
-
Just make the fight, if Fury & Joshua can agree to a 50/50 split for a fight that is realistically worth 3 or 4 times more without arguing for years about it, why can't these guys.
I understand you can't make an opponent fight you, but two undefeated established champions in a fairly similar position, do it at 50/50. You deserve more, you're confident, OK 60/40 to the winner, done.
Can't stand hearing boxers talk about "they're the A-side", ***** I don't care who the A-side is, I want to see who the best boxer is, and if thats you, go get that easy money and keep it moving. Won't take a fight if you don't get a big enough percentage, sounds to me like you aren't too confident.Comment
-
Yea Spence would definitely have less leverage than now but it'll make the fight big enough where 50% then would be more than 60% or 70% now so the fight should be easier to make. 50% against Crawford is probably more than 100% against anybody else at 147.
But then I remember the Mayweather Pacquiao situation where that didn't matter for like 5 years. You never know how greedy these managers, promoters, networks and fighters are.Comment
-
When you decide a PPV purse split you do it based on proven PPV earnings history.
Pac-Crawford would have to sell a lot to make up for the disparity in Crawford's PPV earnings compared to Spence.
And that's assuming that Pacquiao even fights him, which is by no means a given.Comment
Comment