If Crawford beats Pac, Spence doesn’t deserve 50/50 for a unification

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShaneMosleySr
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2019
    • 10325
    • 1,049
    • 903
    • 276,311

    #1

    If Crawford beats Pac, Spence doesn’t deserve 50/50 for a unification

    Just stating the facts here.

    If Crawford beats Pacquiao, the idea of Errol Spence getting 50-percent of the pot in a unification fight with Crawford becomes laughable.

    Crawford would obviously deserve the majority of the pot at that point.
  • Ray*
    Be safe!!!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 44867
    • 1,654
    • 1,608
    • 558,890

    #2
    Hope you get a cut. 50/50 or no 50/50 Bud would be the man at 147. Doesn’t mean he would be the money man at that weight doe. So for legacy and money that would be the fight anyone at 147 needs.

    Comment

    • ReggieKray
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2019
      • 1728
      • 312
      • 468
      • 23,706

      #3
      Makes no sense.. Spence still has the majority of the belts and a better resume and bigger fan base. Especially if the fight takes place in Dallas.

      Comment

      • F l i c k e r
        Il Principe
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 20740
        • 1,324
        • 858
        • 83,771

        #4
        Maybe if Bud had fought for the WBA title when Pacquiao actually had it.

        Then it would be 2 belts vs 2 belts. Ppv buys would be less so- after Crawford gains huge exposure through Pacquiao's star.

        THEN it would be 50/50. But since none of that is happening, Bud beats Pacquiao (as he should) and it will be for nothing but potentially new awareness worldwide for Crawford.

        That's still 60/40 at best.

        Comment

        • QballLobo
          Undisputed Champion
          • Nov 2011
          • 7160
          • 1,311
          • 112
          • 48,002

          #5
          His own promoter said he’s losing money on him. A win against old Pacquiao off a 2 year layoff doesn’t change that.
          Guy needed Amir Khan to get a PPV fight that still bombed.

          Comment

          • ShaneMosleySr
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2019
            • 10325
            • 1,049
            • 903
            • 276,311

            #6
            Lol PBC fan boys are so delusional.

            Pacquiao is the second biggest draw in the sport.

            Beating him does nothing for Crawford in Spence negotiations apparently.

            LMFAO.

            Comment

            • whollisboxing
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2020
              • 1555
              • 274
              • 85
              • 23,858

              #7
              Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
              Just stating the facts here.

              If Crawford beats Pacquiao, the idea of Errol Spence getting 50-percent of the pot in a unification fight with Crawford becomes laughable.

              Crawford would obviously deserve the majority of the pot at that point.
              I think that both guys should care more about their own bottom line than the purse split. Especially since the winner would dictate terms with everyone except Canelo going forward.

              Comment

              • TernceBudCharlo
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2020
                • 5757
                • 1,723
                • 174
                • 34,655

                #8
                Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
                Lol PBC fan boys are so delusional.

                Pacquiao is the second biggest draw in the sport.

                Beating him does nothing for Crawford in Spence negotiations apparently.

                LMFAO.
                Don't forget these are the same people who said that Canelo call all the shots now because he LOST to Mayweather. Remember, if you get a ppv with a legend that does a ton of buys you are the A side for life and get to fight whoever you want. These are the rules the Canelo and Spence fans made, not us. They're just mad because Bud is beating them at their own ****** game.

                Comment

                • pacmanis1
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 2218
                  • 137
                  • 108
                  • 16,982

                  #9
                  Beating the PPV king doesn’t always translate to being the new PPV king. Hopkins didn’t become the biggest draw in the sport once he beat Oscar. Boxing’s weird like that.

                  Comment

                  • War Room
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 9296
                    • 2,806
                    • 662
                    • 19,006

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
                    Just stating the facts here.

                    If Crawford beats Pacquiao, the idea of Errol Spence getting 50-percent of the pot in a unification fight with Crawford becomes laughable.

                    Crawford would obviously deserve the majority of the pot at that point.
                    I swear you and @TernceBudCharlo are the same guy.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP