Comments Thread For: Promoter Lou DiBella Sues Contender O'Shaquie Foster, Citing Breach of Contract

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GBP4LIFE
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2018
    • 3213
    • 986
    • 73
    • 18,476

    #11
    Lou snitching..

    Comment

    • GBP4LIFE
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2018
      • 3213
      • 986
      • 73
      • 18,476

      #12
      He always yelling, screaming, talking tough..

      now he’s snitching

      hope it was J.Prince who tried to take him, Lou don’t want that smoke at all

      Comment

      • Dr Rumack
        I Also Cook
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2012
        • 11870
        • 683
        • 303
        • 22,101

        #13
        Promotion seems like such a bad business to get into. Lou must be pissed at how Eddie Hearn has just walked into the US market and gained more influence than Lou ever had.

        Comment

        • tokon
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 7747
          • 1,874
          • 1,500
          • 42,234

          #14
          Originally posted by Eff Pandas
          Fooked up situation. Without a TV deal a promoter can't really do much right now. Obviously I get the fighter wanting to keep it moving when he's living in an area thats putting on fights, but he's forced to sitting on his hands sucks too. Can't really hate on either sides feelings on this.
          Yes, difficult situation. Promoters aren't always the bad guys!

          Comment

          • Ray*
            Be safe!!!
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 44867
            • 1,654
            • 1,608
            • 558,890

            #15
            Originally posted by DougalDylan
            yep it appears he actually had a “force majeure”, you're right others could learn to add such a clause rather than assume one after the fact ;-)


            Exactly.... “Assume after the fact”

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP