Floyd would have always beaten Pacquiao.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • VG_Addict
    king meat's twin
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2012
    • 5618
    • 237
    • 3
    • 53,380

    #1

    Floyd would have always beaten Pacquiao.

    Counter-punchers are Pacquiao's Kryptonite.
  • _Rexy_
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2018
    • 27929
    • 6,140
    • 3,585
    • 358,040

    #2
    Agreed, look at the Marquez fights. Not to mention there was never a time where Floyd didnt have superior footspeed to get in and out of range

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 49450
      • 5,022
      • 269
      • 104,043

      #3
      I think so but sadly we’ll never know.

      Can just go off what happened when they fought when both were passed their best despite being P4P #1 and #2.

      Comment

      • ShoulderRoll
        Join The Great Resist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 56328
        • 10,185
        • 5,035
        • 763,445

        #4
        I saw what I needed to see when they fought.

        Mayweather was 36 by then and at his age I thought he might have trouble dealing with Pacquiao's footwork and in-and-out movement (like Keith Thurman did years later.) But Floyd actually had the faster, smoother, more intelligent feet which shocked me.

        It also helped that he has such a long reach. With those two attributes he was able to control the distance of the fight.

        In my opinion it would have been an even more dominant win had they faced off when Floyd's was closer to prime.


        Comment

        • Sctrojan
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2019
          • 3412
          • 1,586
          • 418
          • 10,713

          #5
          Maybe,maybe not....but all I know is it would've been a helluva a lot more entertaining fight had it happened when it shouldve,instead Mayweather stalling that shiet out for as long as he did.

          Comment

          • ShoulderRoll
            Join The Great Resist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 56328
            • 10,185
            • 5,035
            • 763,445

            #6
            Originally posted by Sctrojan
            Maybe,maybe not....but all I know is it would've been a helluva a lot more entertaining fight had it happened when it shouldve,instead Mayweather stalling that shiet out for as long as he did.
            Floyd agreed to fight in 2009. It was Pacquiao who ducked because of a little drug testing. Freddie Roach is even on record saying they were the ones to blame.

            This has been covered and rehashed many times.

            Comment

            • Marchegiano
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Aug 2010
              • 12208
              • 1,790
              • 2,307
              • 165,288

              #7
              Yup, but Floyd's so good that don't even really matter, Pac's still pretty great. Too bad the greatest boxers of our generation only causes division among fans. Should have appreciated them mugs. Now we got Canelo.....yay I'm just playing, Canelo's alright

              Comment

              • nubianpiye
                John Snow dies
                • Jul 2014
                • 2264
                • 200
                • 230
                • 38,432

                #8
                100% Floyd and Pac were never career Rivals only fans and the media made it appear that wayt Pac's career Rival was Marquez who also proved to be better than Pac. Oscar Delahoya was Floyd's true career rival. And they still hate each other till this day. Floyd beat pac and went on holiday to the philipines. he sat with Pac and negotiated the contraft to their fight.

                Comment

                • DaNeutral.
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2018
                  • 10087
                  • 1,665
                  • 342
                  • 144,794

                  #9
                  Yep I agree, Floyd would of always beaten Pac. I also feel that Floyd delayed and delayed until Pac started to look like he was diminishing as a fighter cuz Floyd rolls like that, it wasn't marination.

                  But it needn't of been delayed as Floyd would of always had the upper hand in a fight between the two of them

                  Comment

                  • Floyd is TBE
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2016
                    • 3239
                    • 737
                    • 1,097
                    • 27,507

                    #10
                    It was Pac who dragged the fight out, let's be honest. He always need Floyd much more than Floyd needed him. Half of his legacy is just being Floyd's rival. He owes much of his finical success to Floyd. If Pac had lost to Floyd in his prime (which he would have) there'd be no excuses and the public would have moved on to a new boogeyman.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP