Great mailbag. Some very intelligent questions and answers. It never ceases to amaze me how quickly fans can turn on a fighter, ala Lomachenko. Before Lopez, most people were singing his praises and marvelling at his extraordinary powers; now he's just an afterthought.
Lomachenko for all his talent merely ventured to high on the weight scale. Probably 9 times out of ten his talent would have compensated for this, but he ran into a very good fighter in Lopez. Let's also not forget Loma put THREE hard-won belts on the line to Lopez's one.
On the subject of P4P, I don't think Canelo is there yet. If he unifies 168 and retires with another loss to a great fighter, there is a case to be made. I think that case is mostly centred around his ability to improve. I also believe he's dedicated to the sport, despite his surly impersonal attitude.
One thing that is often overlooked is Mayweather's exceptional conditioning over his career. It would have been a huge challenge for any fighter once they 'arrive' and have achieved all that they can to stay in shape, remain focused and keep doing the work day in day out.
Also, why is Crawford totally responsible for securing fights? most of the time they are at least only partially responsible, with negotiations regularly taking more time than a supreme court challenge. IMO, PBC has never been good for the sport. Haymon is in no way connected with boxing other than as a money-making enterprise.
There's nothing illegal about that, but he has introduced or at the very least, accentuated a culture of minimal fights, inter-promotional rivalry and pure profit-making.
I never thought I'd say this but Don King was better for boxing than Haymon. Not for boxers, but for the sport, because he was involved, he was a fan.
Lomachenko for all his talent merely ventured to high on the weight scale. Probably 9 times out of ten his talent would have compensated for this, but he ran into a very good fighter in Lopez. Let's also not forget Loma put THREE hard-won belts on the line to Lopez's one.
On the subject of P4P, I don't think Canelo is there yet. If he unifies 168 and retires with another loss to a great fighter, there is a case to be made. I think that case is mostly centred around his ability to improve. I also believe he's dedicated to the sport, despite his surly impersonal attitude.
One thing that is often overlooked is Mayweather's exceptional conditioning over his career. It would have been a huge challenge for any fighter once they 'arrive' and have achieved all that they can to stay in shape, remain focused and keep doing the work day in day out.
Also, why is Crawford totally responsible for securing fights? most of the time they are at least only partially responsible, with negotiations regularly taking more time than a supreme court challenge. IMO, PBC has never been good for the sport. Haymon is in no way connected with boxing other than as a money-making enterprise.
There's nothing illegal about that, but he has introduced or at the very least, accentuated a culture of minimal fights, inter-promotional rivalry and pure profit-making.
I never thought I'd say this but Don King was better for boxing than Haymon. Not for boxers, but for the sport, because he was involved, he was a fan.
Comment