Miguel Cotto: "Me and Pacquiao Will Be a War"

[Raphz]

cotto is talking **** now... but why was he afraid to put the belt on the line before? if not for a thunder of opinions that he would not be pressured for doing so. thats pure bull**** to cotto! i juz hope you'll eat **** when you will taste PACMAN's barrage of powerful punches!

[prsi]

exactly!!!!



nah man... pac was 148.xx against dlh and against hatton... pac did not get any bigger. its possible pac might be a little bigger in this fight... like you say around 150 lbs... but cotto will probably be 160+ lbs... the pic in my sig was a long time ago. using your paradigm, cotto should be 160+ lbs, not 158 lbs.

/argument.

Okay we are half way there. Agreed Pacman probably 150 max., but like i said on my previous post that tale of the tape you post, true it was 2 years ago but it was at 147 not 145 and Cotto didn't have at that moment his physical trainer (Landman) who is now in charge of his conditioning and diet.
That should take care of any dangerous blown up weight come fight night which he didn't have in the past.

[Hiram Joel]

I'm tired of all this bickering of idiot cotto and pacquiao fans. No matter what happens in fight Pacquiao will always be remembered as an ATG and cotto will be remembered as a champion who fought some very good fighters and won a whole bunch of fights and lost to a known cheater. Not bad for both fighters.

Co-God darn-sigh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Pullcounter]

Okay we are half way there. Agreed Pacman probably 150 max., but like i said on my previous post that tale of the tape you post, true it was 2 years ago but it was at 147 not 145 and Cotto didn't have at that moment his physical trainer (Landman) who is now in charge of his conditioning and diet.
That should take care of any dangerous blown up weight come fight night which he didn't have in the past.

get serious man.

1) 145 lbs is 2 lbs away from 147 lbs.
2) the physical trainer bit doesn't work because pac also has a physical trainer.

both your supporting arguments are weak. give it up.

[ricky1978]

they both know each other weaknesses, I hope they dont KO each other out in the 1st round!!!

[prsi]

1) cotto said pac's wins are overrated (diaz, dlh, hatton)
2) cotto said he knows pac's weakness
3) cotto said morales beat pac so he should be able to
4) pac is a former 106 lber
5) pac is untested at 147 lbs
6) cotto has a huge size advantage

yes it does. cotto is talking mad **** (for cotto). cotton has a big size advantage. if cotto can't back up his words and if Cotto can't take advantage of his size advantage, he is a disgrace to himself and his island.

1, 2, and 3 are part of his opinion and he's entitled to say what he thinks.
4) Cotto was a 105 fighter at amateur, fighting guys like Calderon. The difference is that Pacman didn't have the Amateur career that Cotto had.
5) Lots of fighter have moved up untested and beat the champion of a higher divison. We are talking about a "p4p" king moving up not a class b fighter.
6) Pacman has a huge speed advantage.

If we are going to call a disgrace a boxer that for a fight couldn't back up what they said we will have a very empty HOF because all the great fighters have once lost saying that they will beat, know there oponents weakness and even discredit some of his previous fights.
Regarding the size advantage it will only be in weight because Cotto is 1/2" taller and they both have the same reach.

[prsi]

get serious man.

1) 145 lbs is 2 lbs away from 147 lbs.
2) the physical trainer bit doesn't work because pac also has a physical trainer.

both your supporting arguments are weak. give it up.

A physical trainer does work, why do you think they exist. This Physical trainer not only works with his conditioning but with his diet controling what he eats and his metabolism. Why do you think Dr. recomend fiber and other sorts of food to help your health. It's because of the way ou eat and how it reflect on your body specially on the fat that ou naturally gain over the years. Cotto didn't have that in the past.

If you don't think that it doesn't make a difference then you are right I'll give it up because there no sense on discussing with you that has been scientifically and physically proven.

It's your turn to get serious

[juneaki]

first cotto will not come in ****** and reckless like hatton did and two cotto can takes pacs punches seriously pac will **** a brick when he hit him flush and cotto walks through it.

The same is true with Pacman, he will not come in ****** to just stand in front of Cotto and get hit! Pacman will throw 3-5 punches combi to 1-2 punch of Cotto. He will get in and out and will time to release his killer left hook to that chin of Cotto when oppurtunity comes. Defensewise, Pacman is better than Cotto.

[Pullcounter]

1, 2, and 3 are part of his opinion and he's entitled to say what he thinks.

nah man, he's talking ****, so he needs to back it up.

4) Cotto was a 105 fighter at amateur, fighting guys like Calderon. The difference is that Pacman didn't have the Amateur career that Cotto had.

don't sweat the #. the truth is cotto has no business losing to a smaller fighter.

5) Lots of fighter have moved up untested and beat the champion of a higher divison. We are talking about a "p4p" king moving up not a class b fighter.

yeah, and there have been more fighters moving up untested and getting beat. that's why there is the adage "the good big man beats the good little man".

6) Pacman has a huge speed advantage.

cotto has good timing and is much stronger and punches alot harder.

If we are going to call a disgrace a boxer that for a fight couldn't back up what they said we will have a very empty HOF because all the great fighters have once lost saying that they will beat, know there oponents weakness and even discredit some of his previous fights.

cotto will be a disgrace, but he will get chances to redeem himself in other fights.

Regarding the size advantage it will only be in weight because Cotto is 1/2" taller and they both have the same reach.

its not just weight. the weight is just a number. its what that weight represents. cotto will be much much stronger than pac.

A physical trainer does work, why do you think they exist. This Physical trainer not only works with his conditioning but with his diet controling what he eats and his metabolism. Why do you think Dr. recomend fiber and other sorts of food to help your health. It's because of the way ou eat and how it reflect on your body specially on the fat that ou naturally gain over the years. Cotto didn't have that in the past.

If you don't think that it doesn't make a difference then you are right I'll give it up because there no sense on discussing with you that has been scientifically and physically proven.

you don't get the point. pac has gotten bigger and bigger even with a physical trainer. so it's nonsensical that a physical trainer will make cotto weigh less. understand?

It's your turn to get serious

I have been. you're arguments are weak. just concede defeat.

[MaynMan]

but its so easy to say hatton is overated after pac demolished him. he was unbeaten in his division and atop 10 p4ponder. just look at the malignaggi performance which shows he demolished a decent fighter in malignaggi. the way i see it people will discredit pacs opponents untill he looses or faces mayweather. its realy sad because in hindsite a lot of people were saying he would get beat by oscar and hatton, now he gets close to 0 credit.

I feel you bro and I fully agree. A lot of people don't give PAC credit for his wins and puts emphasis on his losses.

See what they say on these fights:

Pac-MAB1: WIN- Barrera had surgery in his head and there was a fire near his camp.
Pac-Morales1: Loss- Pacquiao was schooled.
Pac-Morales2: Win: Morales was weight drained
PAc-Morales3: Win: Morales was old and shot and weight drained.
Pac-JMM: Draw: PAc was schooled from round 2 onwards.
Pac-JMM2: Win: Marquez should've won decision.
Pac-ODLH: Win: De La Hoya was shot and weight drained.
Pac-Hatton: Hatton is an overrated bum.

Come on. The guy works his ass off and comes to fight and wins almost everytime but they always find some ****** excuse. It's as if all he had to do was show up and he would've won.

PBF and Cotto said: "He lost to Morales". Since when did losing to Morales become such a bad thing??? That's THE Erik Morales, Future Hall of Famer.