The difference here is even the commentators agreed with Paulie. In Cotto vs Clottey Commentators agreed with decision.
Paulie out boxed Diaz. Clottey did not out box Cotto nor did he do enough for the win.
Co-sign. Exactly my thoughts. It's that plain and simple. Post is precise, short and to the point.
I am a fan of Cotto, Clottey and Diaz. I felt that Clottey won the fight against Cotto, but agree that it could be seen in favor of Cotto. However as a Diaz fan I could not see in anyway how he won that fight, ecspecially by as wide a margin as the scores had it.
You did see the title thread, right? I'd merely made a comment about Cotto fans making a raucous about the Pacquiao-Marquez 2 fight when the same thing happened in the in the Cotto-Clottey fight.
I thought Clottey lost, but cotto gets hometown advantage in MSG and in Puerto Rico, same as diaz got last night.
never fight these guys in their hometown unless u plan on KTFOing them.
Cotto gets that decision wherever the fight is held in America.
Ill tell you why.(aside the fact that he simply won)
If your basing your reasoning on Latinos or Africans (ethnicity) backing up their guy, Then Clottey is out of luck because I know nowhere where Africans outnumber Latinos in any arena.
Cotto gets decision in Las Vegas or Cali., Chicago, Florida, Conn. Atlantic City, Detroit or wherever.
That's one of those convenient excuses. (Trinidad got a decision In Hoya's backyard) Excuse # 2 (the back up) -****** Judges.
Agreed. Clottey was clearly robbed. The same thing can be applied to Mexican fans. Since Pernell and Taylor were robbed. And how gifts Oscar De La Hoya has gotten. Disgusting, it's true what Kellerman since "It's the market that dictates the fights"
You're such a fruit Flawless. Taylor was not robbed against JCC. I'll give you the one on Whitaker.
Comment