Whitaker vs Pacman @ lightweight (in their lightweight primes!)

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Me La Pelan
    ME LA PELAN
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 3041
    • 108
    • 360
    • 10,966

    #11
    And lets say the Ring size would have been Small

    Comment

    • Rockin'
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2004
      • 23907
      • 4,461
      • 12,395
      • 1,239,562

      #12
      Pernells speed negates Pacs speed and his defense and movement keep Pac rushing forward into Whitakers jabs and uppercuts. Pernell would punch holes in him.......................Rockin'

      Comment

      • Spacey1991
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 8885
        • 247
        • 282
        • 18,684

        #13
        Pernell by UD IMO.

        Comment

        • illmatickid
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2009
          • 1345
          • 65
          • 22
          • 7,578

          #14
          somehow i feel like if they fought at lightweight it'll be like his de la hoya fight

          like pernell wins in our eyes but some how the judges will give it to pacquiao on the scorecards

          Comment

          • _original_
            Dinamita
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 17838
            • 1,872
            • 789
            • 67,167

            #15
            Sweet Pea makes a fool out of Pac-Man....PAc would be tailor maid for Pea, man it would be rediculous probally like 10-2 rounds....

            Comment

            • Toney Loc
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 12092
              • 597
              • 1,190
              • 14,860

              #16
              I don't see too many Pacquiao fans in this thread.

              Comment

              • zeidrich
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 1791
                • 78
                • 42
                • 8,176

                #17
                this is pretty obvious, have you even read the boxing rule #131311 @ page 145? is says there that present fighters <<<<<<<< past fighters, its a mortal sin to match a present fighter to a past fighter.

                no present fighters wins against past fighters
                sad to say but boxing fans leaves in the past, thats why its hard to get a new superstars in boxing nowadays because its already accepted that past fighters will always be superior no matter what happens

                Comment

                • NakiFan
                  Banned
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 6971
                  • 435
                  • 268
                  • 9,796

                  #18
                  America by UD

                  Comment

                  • street bully
                    Tua's daddy.
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 25014
                    • 696
                    • 263
                    • 35,118

                    #19
                    Sweet Pea by UD.

                    Comment

                    • nujabes77
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 8359
                      • 535
                      • 354
                      • 16,443

                      #20
                      pac by late ko/tko

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP