Originally posted by jazluvr449
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Attention Cotto haters (Perro, street bully, etc)
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Iceta View PostAnother thing that I think makes Cotto hated on in these forums is the fact that his most hardcore fans won't give any credit to any other boxer it seems like unless they have fought Cotto. They constantly down talk Paul Williams and say ****** things like he is ducking Clottey when in actuality, it's the other way around. Arum is the one keeping his boys away from Paul. He tried to stop the Margarito-Williams fight from happening and he stopped the rematch from happening. I also wouldn't be suprised if he made Pavlik pull out of the fight. And here Cotto fans are saying Williams is ducking Clottey when Arum hasn't even put any money on the table for the fight to happen. Williams has already said that he'd be happy to send Clottey back to Ghana in a boat.
And the fact that Cotto squats on vacant title belts and doesn't make any attempt to clean up his controversial wins is something that also turns me off about him along with his dirty tactics he resorts to when it seems like his will is broken. He also gets paid an excessive amount of money for the mediocre opponents he fights like Gomez and Jennings. He got paid more to fight Jennings than what Mosley got paid to fight Margarito.
At 140 he defended against Torres, Malignaggi, Corley and many others.
At 147 he defended his WBA title against Judah, Mosley, Gomez and Margarito, and has defended his WBO title against Clottey, and soon to be Pacquiao.
I can see why biased people would use the winning vacant belts argument. But only a true ****** would accuse him of squatting on his belts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by savorduhflavor View PostAre you freakin' kidding me? Do you know what "squatting on a belt" is? That is when you win a belt and don't defend it against anyone of note.
At 140 he defended against Torres, Malignaggi, Corley and many others.
At 147 he defended his WBA title against Judah, Mosley, Gomez and Margarito, and has defended his WBO title against Clottey, and soon to be Pacquiao.
I can see why biased people would use the winning vacant belts argument. But only a true ****** would accuse him of squatting on his belts.
Peace,
jaz
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by savorduhflavor View PostAre you freakin' kidding me? Do you know what "squatting on a belt" is? That is when you win a belt and don't defend it against anyone of note.
At 140 he defended against Torres, Malignaggi, Corley and many others.
At 147 he defended his WBA title against Judah, Mosley, Gomez and Margarito, and has defended his WBO title against Clottey, and soon to be Pacquiao.
I can see why biased people would use the winning vacant belts argument. But only a true ****** would accuse him of squatting on his belts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iceta View PostI actually don't make as big of a deal about it as some other posters do, because I realize that Hatton never expressed any interest in fighting Cotto, and the way that Cotto blew Quintana out was impressive. But the fact still remains that Cotto has yet to beat the #1 ranked guy in any division he has fought in. Am I wrong in saying that? And the most blatant case of moving in on a vacant title was after he lost to Margarito. Williams would've happily fought Cotto. But just like every Cotto stan says on this forum says, he needs to get his PPV game up. Sound familiar? And Cotto has never even uttered Paul's name.
And no, I don't say **** about Williams being a draw. But, if I was Cotto's manager, there's no way I'd let him fight Williams, RIGHT after he got the ass kicking of a lifetime against Margarito. Did you really expect him to fight Williams right after his loss to Margarito, because that's just simply being unreasonable.
You're like Horus trying to respond to me by saying something that had nothing to do with the original argument.
Comment
-
Originally posted by savorduhflavor View PostYou completely dodged the question at hand. Does Cotto squat on his belts? The answer is no, and that's not debatable.
And no, I don't say **** about Williams being a draw. But, if I was Cotto's manager, there's no way I'd let him fight Williams, RIGHT after he got the ass kicking of a lifetime against Margarito. Did you really expect him to fight Williams right after his loss to Margarito, because that's just simply being unreasonable.
You're like Horus trying to respond to me by saying something that had nothing to do with the original argument.
Comment
Comment