Pacquiao vs Marquez II.

[LA BAD BOYtake2]

I had it 115-113 for Marquez.

Close fight but I've watched it many times and everytime I score it for Marquez.

He should have won.

If you watch that fight many times and you have 115-113 for MARQUEZ
then you need serious help!

PACQUIAO knocked him down then only way you can have is 114-113!

[catalinul]

If you watch that fight many times and you have 115-113 for MARQUEZ
then you need serious help!

PACQUIAO knocked him down then only way you can have is 114-113!

Your math is terrible.

I had 1 round even so it's 115-113.

[Iceta]

I thought the decision in the rematch was totally fair, but to me JMM was the guy going stronger toward the end. Even in the tenth round of where Pacquiao pulled the round out by catching JMM with that up and under right when JMM was coming forward I saw an instance of where Pacquiao spit his mouth piece out. And he was the one backing up and giving ground to JMM in the very last round. I also factor in the superiority in compubox numbers in punches landed that Marquez had over Manny. I thought what gave Pacquaio the victory was the third round knockdown. I also thought you could make a case for a 10-7 round in that one since JMM grabbed the rope and sat on it for a second. So you can make arguments for each guy. But there is a reason why Pacquiao took half the payday to fight David Diaz in his next fight.

[DiegoFuego]

Pacquiao won both fights. First time, I thought he won going away, 8 rounds to 4 plus 3 knockdowns. Second time, I had it 114-113 Pacquiao, 6 rounds a piece, but the knockdown swings it to the Pacman. Marquez needs to learn to stay on his feet if he wants to complain about decisions in the future. When you're the one who gets dropped, you have very little margin for complaint.

I noticed a lot of people who scored the fight to Marquez gave him the two closest rounds of the fight. I believe they were rounds 1 and 7. Pacquiao won the first round, for those of you scoring it for Marquez. Maybe you need to watch it again and again, but please do.

[DiegoFuego]

Your math is terrible.

I had 1 round even so it's 115-113.

No offense, but if you're scoring even rounds, then you really don't need to be judging fights at all. If you can't pay attention for 3 straight minutes and figure out in your head who won the round, then just stop scoring altogether and enjoy the fight.

[baracuda]

dude lederman had mayweather clearly beating castillo the first fight and that was crazy. Letterman had pacquiao beating marquez the last round and compubox numbers clearly favored marquez. Lederman is a dumbass imo, i never listen to that dudes.

lederman scored the floyd vs jlc 1 for castillo.....

lederman also scored both pac vs jmm fights for pacquiao.....

stop lyin!

[catalinul]

No offense, but if you're scoring even rounds, then you really don't need to be judging fights at all. If you can't pay attention for 3 straight minutes and figure out in your head who won the round, then just stop scoring altogether and enjoy the fight.

None taken.

Yet I'm not judging fights.I'm just scoring them for myself and I felt both scored or didn't in the same measure I''ll score it even.

But I do limit scoring even rounds at 1 in a fight.

[LA BAD BOYtake2]

Your math is terrible.

I had 1 round even so it's 115-113.

One round even?

I never saw Lederman that has 1 round even!

Maybe once,I think he score one round even ORTIZ MAIDANA.

But you are moron if you had one round even in PACQUIAO JMM fight!

[LA BAD BOYtake2]

No offense, but if you're scoring even rounds, then you really don't need to be judging fights at all. If you can't pay attention for 3 straight minutes and figure out in your head who won the round, then just stop scoring altogether and enjoy the fight.

I agree with you!

[catalinul]

One round even?

I never saw Lederman that has 1 round even!

Maybe once,I think he score one round even ORTIZ MAIDANA.

But you are moron if you had one round even in PACQUIAO JMM fight!

So I'm a moron because you never saw Lederman score a even round?