Bruce Lee streetfight

[cvt]

Jeezus talk about blind...A world class Boxer would "destroy" a world class martial artist "with ease"?

For christ's sake, why don't you just say that you hate Martial Arts because they were too complicated for you to learn? LMFAO

jose is obviously ignorrant and is basing his martial arts opinion on movies and demonstrations in tournaments. real street application martial arts is as gritty as it gets. i can tell you right now jose has never felt a good thai leg kick, been taken down and arm barred, elbowed, or eye gouged.

[IwatchBoxing]

Make an account here, www.enterbrucelee.com , than go to their video gallery, they have Bruce Lee home videos of him working out, and stuff. From what I know now, he could beat Boxing/UFC Champions easily, all the way to Heaveyweight, I think thats pretty safe to say. No doubt he'd kick Chavez's ass .

[hollister]

jose is obviously ignorrant and is basing his martial arts opinion on movies and demonstrations in tournaments. real street application martial arts is as gritty as it gets. i can tell you right now jose has never felt a good thai leg kick, been taken down and arm barred, elbowed, or eye gouged.

Yeah I don't know why he is so biased in his comparison, you would think he would like it more since his thing is UFC tournaments and such. Many people think that Martial Arts only consists of styles like Tae-Kwon-Do and don't realise just how many different styles there are.

[Chups]

Martial Arts are a joke. A world class boxewr would destroy and Martial Artist with ease. All that fancy ****...guess what? It dont work in the real world.

What the hell Jose? I thought you like MMA (Mix Martial Arts) now you're saying it's a joke. Oh man...


Fancy **** they do are movie ****s. Martial arts work in real life...defending urself or trying to beat the hell out of some peeps you want beat.
99 out of 100 somebody who "know" Martial Arts will beat somebody who doesn't know ****. MMA fighters will beat most peeps in a fight.

[Chups]

Yeah I don't know why he is so biased in his comparison, you would think he would like it more since his thing is UFC tournaments and such. Many people think that Martial Arts only consists of styles like Tae-Kwon-Do and don't realise just how many different styles there are.

Now I get it.....some peeps just think Martial arts are just those "old oriental words". MMA (hence martial arts in the name) is Martial arts. They combined different styles to make 1 style which makes it another style of martial arts. Just like Juijutsu came from judo and several other styles. I studied YAW YAN (check out the website) It's a combination of juijutsu and kickboxing. (one hell of a combination)

[xrhythmxnxbluesx]

Martial Arts are a joke. A world class boxewr would destroy and Martial Artist with ease. All that fancy ****...guess what? It dont work in the real world.

you's a mark beezy.. face it was juss too complicated for you to learn... a thai fighter will or mma fighter will have a an upper hand over a boxer...

[PunchDrunk]

poit is, in most cases, a boxer isn't to be successful out of their element just like a martial artist isn't going to win a boxing match... hopkins isn't going to beat tito ortiz in the UFC and ortiz isn't going to beat nard in a boxing match....

That, I can agree with.

[Chups]

Let's just put it this way:

A boxer will most likely beat an MMA fighter in a boxing match and an MMA fighter will most likely beat a boxer in an MMA tournament.An MMA fighter will most likely lose to a Tae-Kwon-do practictioner in a Tae Kwon-do Olympics, just as Taekwon do won't probably get gold against a wrestler in wrestling. It's a simple as that.
In the "REAL WORLD" streetfight it's very unlikely to see a PRO fighter challenge another PRO fighter (whatever his martial arts be). The ordinary day to day scenario is a thug challenging another thug or guy. OR a thug or guy challenging a guy with a knowledge in M.A..The guy who studies M.A. will have the upperhand than a guy who knows nothing. Now a guy who knows M.A. meeting with a thug knowing M.A. will probably depend on how good the individual is.

Any body agrees with me?

[simeraksou]

First of all, a YOUNGER Botha got knocked the **** out by an over the hill Mike Tyson, and by Lennox Lewis. So why shouldn't a YOUNG K-1 champ be able to knock his, by this time, even older ass out? And Mercer's even more over the hill than Botha (if that's even possible). You name any boxer in his PRIME who's gotten knocked out in K-1, and MAYBE you have a point. But you can't.

Well, I was just responding to jose's comment that a boxer would defeat another martial artist easily. If that were true, mercer and botha would have won even if they were fighting younger fighters. A boxer always has a chance in any fight due to excellent striking ability. However, a boxer is particularly vulnerable if taken to the ground.

[simeraksou]

Let's just put it this way:

A boxer will most likely beat an MMA fighter in a boxing match and an MMA fighter will most likely beat a boxer in an MMA tournament.An MMA fighter will most likely lose to a Tae-Kwon-do practictioner in a Tae Kwon-do Olympics, just as Taekwon do won't probably get gold against a wrestler in wrestling. It's a simple as that.
In the "REAL WORLD" streetfight it's very unlikely to see a PRO fighter challenge another PRO fighter (whatever his martial arts be). The ordinary day to day scenario is a thug challenging another thug or guy. OR a thug or guy challenging a guy with a knowledge in M.A..The guy who studies M.A. will have the upperhand than a guy who knows nothing. Now a guy who knows M.A. meeting with a thug knowing M.A. will probably depend on how good the individual is.

Any body agrees with me?

Yeah that sounds pretty reasonable to me