What Does a COTTO Win over MANNY PACQUIAO Mean?
Collapse
-
-
lets put it like this a cotto win over manny is a wayyyyyyyy better win than a floyd win or jmm manny has tested 147 and was dominating135 140 147 when he fought there jmm wasnt dominating at 135 he did win both his fights but they were both close were he was getting hit alot and were battles not one sided beatdowns like manny does. manny tested ww before and dominated jmm never fought above 135 and wasnt dominating at that weight eitherComment
-
Comment
-
A pacquiao win over a weight drain zombie oscar is a better win
than a win over the A Prime WBA champion Collazo?
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh....
Comment
-
Comment
-
lets put it like this a cotto win over manny is a wayyyyyyyy better win than a floyd win or jmm manny has tested 147 and was dominating135 140 147 when he fought there jmm wasnt dominating at 135 he did win both his fights but they were both close were he was getting hit alot and were battles not one sided beatdowns like manny does. manny tested ww before and dominated jmm never fought above 135 and wasnt dominating at that weight either
Pacquiao best weight is not WELTERWEIGHT
Pacquiao never fought a PRIME welterweight
So how is a Pacquiao win at WELTERWEIGHT a great win and not a mediocre one? since Pacquiao is a blown up lightweight?
More importantly why is Cotto fighting blown up lightweights at ww, when he could be fighting deserving fighters at WW would love to fight him...
If cotto wants to fight blown up lightweights he should fight at lightweight
dont you agree..?
Like Mangler reminds us everyday
Comment
-
If a fighter moves up and fights a Mediocre fighters at a higher weight effectively and look good doing it. does that now mean they prove they can fight beat everybody at that weight class...???
When Roy beat John Ruiz at Heavyweight, did that mean he can also beat Lennox lewis??? Because Roy Proved he can fight effectively and look good at Heavyweight against a good fighter.
and on the other side
If a fighter moves up and fights real good competition but doesnt look impressive doing it, does it now mean he shouldnt fight at that weight?
I mean some fighters you just not going to look good against period.
Thats has nothing to do with you, but it has everything to do with the other fighter.
I mean look at Floyd first fight at 135 pounds...against Castillo..
Floyd didnt look impressive at all winning that fight ... but did that mean he should of moved back down to 130??? because he wasnt effective at 135 as he was at 130???
Of Course not...!!!
do you get the point?
being effective has to do with your opponent very little with the fighter..!!
Luis Collazo is not a bum and he is a very difficult fighter to beat especially if that is your FIRST fight at Welterweight. Like it was for Ricky Hatton.
I am pretty sure JMM can look impressive at WW if he fought Delvin Rodriguez and Michael Jennings instead of Mayweather too but that is not the point.
Your Opponent is the deciding factor in a fighter looking effective not the fighter most of the timeComment
-
Pacquiao is not a WELTERWEIGHT....
Pacquiao best weight is not WELTERWEIGHT
Pacquiao never fought a PRIME welterweight
So how is a Pacquiao win at WELTERWEIGHT a great win and not a mediocre one? since Pacquiao is a blown up lightweight?
More importantly why is Cotto fighting blown up lightweights at ww, when he could be fighting deserving fighters at WW would love to fight him...
If cotto wants to fight blown up lightweights he should fight at lightweight
dont you agree..?
Like Mangler reminds us everydayComment
-
Comment
Comment