“Fighting Words” – No Mas? Nate Campbell Says: “This Was Different.”

[Pullcounter]

Nate Campbell quit.

he did, but for good reason, the blood vessel in his eye burst from the headbutt. that kinda injury can't be fixed by a cutman.

[Glamour Puss]

he did, but for good reason, the blood vessel in his eye burst from the headbutt. that kinda injury can't be fixed by a cutman.

He didn't know that at the time. He's not a doctor.

He seemed to be doing pretty good as soon as it was stopped.

[Pullcounter]

He didn't know that at the time. He's not a doctor.

He seemed to be doing pretty good as soon as it was stopped.

I seem to hold my liquor good too, but that doesn't mean I should be driving when i'm drunk.

[Glamour Puss]

I seem to hold my liquor good too, but that doesn't mean I should be driving when i'm drunk.

I've seen too many other better fighters than Nate fight through much worse to believe anything he says.

He took a risk and it blew up in his face.

[Pullcounter]

I've seen too many other better fighters than Nate fight through much worse to believe anything he says.

He took a risk and it blew up in his face.

use facts and logic, not emotion. you base your decision to berate nate by comparing him with other fighters who you deem more deserving than him.

[Glamour Puss]

use facts and logic, not emotion. you base your decision to berate nate by comparing him with other fighters who you deem more deserving than him.

Is that condescending enough?

That is fact. Having seen other fighters hurt much worse and continue to fight is empirical evidence.

How much logic do you need for this? Its boxing not philosophy.

He got roughed up, didn't like it, tried to pull a fast one and it blew up in his face?

[Walter Kovacs]

bring on Quittor Ortiz vs Quit Campbell.

"stop the fight, stop the fight" bwahahhaa

[Pullcounter]

Is that condescending enough?

i'm not trying to be condescending. based on your previous post, its clear that you use emotions to make your judgments for you. you have positive emotions for certain fighters, which influence you to have negative emotions for nate campbell. you use your emotions, not logic or facts.

That is fact. Having seen other fighters hurt much worse and continue to fight is empirical evidence.

what does other fighters being hurt worse and continuing have anything to do with nate campbell????!!!!

nate campbell was headbutted before the 3rd round. the headbutt caused him to lose vision in his left eye. fights have been stopped for lesser things that losing vision in one eye. because the fight was stopped via a foul (headbutt) the decision should be a no contest.

it is clear in the rules that if a boxer does not have vision in both eyes the bout should be stopped to protect said boxer.

again, you facts and logic specific to nate campbell's situation.

what other boxers do and how you FEEL about it has nothing to do with nate campbell.

How much logic do you need for this? Its boxing not philosophy.

yeah, but you need to have coherent logic to make / prove your arguements. otherwise you're just making stuff up.

He got roughed up, didn't like it, tried to pull a fast one and it blew up in his face?

lol... nate is from the school of hard knocks. give up this argument. nate was getting roughed up against diaz as well as againt funeka. please be logical and use facts not emotions.

[Glamour Puss]

You're the one using emotions.

You treat his case as some sort of anomaly in a sport filled with similar cases where fighters were clearly hurt but managed to persevere.

I don't care what his excuse was, headbutt, rabbit punch or the fanman, he quit.

What do other fighters have to do with Nate Campbell?

Everything.

They were all hurting badly but they decided to fight on.

Nate Campbell talks like he's from the school of hard knocks but he acts like a quitter.

You try too hard to sound smart btw.

This is an open and shut case. No need to embellish with your pseudo intellectual musings.

[Pullcounter]

You're the one using emotions.

nope, you are.

You treat his case as some sort of anomaly in a sport filled with similar cases where fighters were clearly hurt but managed to persevere.

1) nate has been hurt before and managed to persevere

2) nate could not see out of his left eye. fights get stopped for lesser thing.

stop using your emotions and use hard cold logic and facts that actually pertain the campbell's case.

I don't care what his excuse was, headbutt, rabbit punch or the fanman, he quit.

i never disputed that he quit. but he could not see out of his left eye!!!! being blind in one eye is legitimate grounds to stop a fight. this is in the rules not made up by fan consensus. SERIOUSLY ITS A RULE!!!

What do other fighters have to do with Nate Campbell?

Everything.

They were all hurting badly but they decided to fight on.

Nate Campbell talks like he's from the school of hard knocks but he acts like a quitter.

1) nate has been hurt badly before and decided to fight on.

you argument fails.

You try too hard to sound smart btw.

This is an open and shut case. No need to embellish with your pseudo intellectual musings.

if you want to make claims, you have to back them up with real facts, not just how other boxers make you FEEL and how that influences your decision about nate campbell on one particular night.

the devil is in the details!!!!