For the good of Boxing, Miguel Cotto MUST WIN

[TRAVI$]

As Silencer said, it's a win-win situation
Although, I do believe a Pacquaio win would attract more casual fans.

[FLYBOY]

As Silencer said, it's a win-win situation
Although, I do believe a Pacquaio win would attract more casual fans.

hey if Cotto wins, he would be the new superstar just like Pacquiao became the new superstar after beating Oscar DLH.

[Swoosh]

I agree. Cotto winning is better for boxing. Not for the mainstream but for the good of the sport as a whole. I don't think i've ever voted for Cotto and have always pulled for Manny, but the **** Manny is pulling is just complete crap. Making up the rules as you go is a b!tch move.

[Grand Champ]

True, this Pacman-is-god thing have gone far enough. Him getting his own divison, it's getting out of hand. My boy cotto better knock him on his ass.

[FLYBOY]

I agree. Cotto winning is better for boxing. Not for the mainstream but for the good of the sport as a whole. I don't think i've ever voted for Cotto and have always pulled for Manny, but the **** Manny is pulling is just complete crap. Making up the rules as you go is a b!tch move.

pac is acting like prima donna

[xcaret]

the wbc didnt create that ****** title for manny, it doesnt take a few days for them to say "oh look lets make a catchweight title for pacquiao" ****** morons.

[WhoreUs]

hey if Cotto wins, he would be the new superstar just like Pacquiao became the new superstar after beating Oscar DLH.

a cotto win is meaningless compared to a pacquiao win.

people won't be up for cotto-mayweather as they would be pacquiao-mayweather.

that's just a fact.



besides even if cotto wins in doesn't mean anything. he can't beat mayweather. at least pacquiao would have a decent chance.