WBO = Shameless

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • borikua
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2004
    • 12530
    • 686
    • 745
    • 20,193

    #1

    WBO = Shameless

    Cotto should burn that ****ty belt. I just read an article on endi.com from Valcarcel were he says that even if Cotto doesn't put the title on the line, the WBO has to approve ANY fight from their champions and the fighter has to pay the fine EVEN if the title is not on the line. Supposely the champ and the challenger have to pay 3% of their purse to the WBO up to a max of $150K each. So they will have to pay the WBO $300,000.
  • -PedoBear-
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 1218
    • 116
    • 141
    • 1,601

    #2
    Originally posted by borikua
    Cotto should burn that ****ty belt. I just read an article on endi.com from Valcarcel were he says that even if Cotto doesn't put the title on the line, the WBO has to approve ANY fight from their champions and the fighter has to pay the fine EVEN if the title is not on the line. Supposely the champ and the challenger have to pay 3% of their purse to the WBO up to a max of $150K each. So they will have to pay the WBO $300,000.
    Pavlik had to pay sanctioning fees for his fight w/ hopkins.... at 170!!!

    if the fighters would stop fighting for the belts they wouldnt have to pay for them....

    its that simple

    Comment

    • WhoreUs
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 15770
      • 556
      • 606
      • 20,363

      #3
      Originally posted by borikua
      Cotto should burn that ****ty belt. I just read an article on endi.com from Valcarcel were he says that even if Cotto doesn't put the title on the line, the WBO has to approve ANY fight from their champions and the fighter has to pay the fine EVEN if the title is not on the line. Supposely the champ and the challenger have to pay 3% of their purse to the WBO up to a max of $150K each. So they will have to pay the WBO $300,000.
      they're all like that.

      of course they want a cut of EVERY fight.



      i wouldn't be surprised if they strip cotto and put the vacant belt on the line for pacquiao (if pacquiao pays the fees)

      Comment

      • vercingetorix3
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 1581
        • 73
        • 152
        • 8,356

        #4
        WBA = Shameless, with their Super and Regular Champions,
        IBF = Shameless, Margarito and Clottey both had to vacate their versions to fight Cotto,
        WBC = Shameless, it's the WBC.

        Comment

        • borikua
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2004
          • 12530
          • 686
          • 745
          • 20,193

          #5
          If I was Cotto I wouldn't pay them **** and make them go to the courts.

          Comment

          • freeloada
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2009
            • 3135
            • 269
            • 163
            • 10,218

            #6
            wbo is crap.. they wont back up any of their champions.. they know miguel cotto is right about the belt/weight issue, yet they dont care and are gonna make it for a vacant title if cotto drops the belt.. its dumb.. back up your company's champ.! cotto should vacate the belt. throw it in the trash and burn that ****.. then if he wins it back againts pacman he should drop it in the middle of the ring and stomp on that ****..

            Comment

            • MANGLER
              Sex Tape Flop Artist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 30142
              • 1,705
              • 2,355
              • 46,598

              #7
              Only way for Cotto to keep that damn belt is to defend it and win the fight. If he's annoyed wit the sanctioning fee, just ditch it and leave it at that.

              Comment

              • Shadow boxer 3
                Ain't no half steppin'
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Oct 2008
                • 8528
                • 502
                • 635
                • 16,216

                #8
                cotto's gonna vacate

                Comment

                • Shadow boxer 3
                  Ain't no half steppin'
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 8528
                  • 502
                  • 635
                  • 16,216

                  #9
                  Originally posted by freeloada
                  wbo is crap.. they wont back up any of their champions.. they know miguel cotto is right about the belt/weight issue, yet they dont care and are gonna make it for a vacant title if cotto drops the belt.. its dumb.. back up your company's champ.! cotto should vacate the belt. throw it in the trash and burn that ****.. then if he wins it back againts pacman he should drop it in the middle of the ring and stomp on that ****..
                  co sign .

                  Comment

                  • P4P Opinion
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 1778
                    • 143
                    • 73
                    • 8,170

                    #10
                    All of the four major sanctioning bodies are shameless. If it isn't The Ring's belt, you can't class yourself as a champion as far as I'm concerned.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP