Floyd was bigger than Hatton when he KOd him. Pac wasn't.

[Sin City]

ill leave it at this. who took Hattons Zero? who laid a blueprint? it was May. **** Pacs winover hatton. he didnt beat him first so it doesnt matter in my book. especially when Hatton didnt look good against Malinaggi.

put one and one together. Hatton was damaged goods...there i said it

Mayweather wasn't the first to beat De La Hoya, Gatti, Baldomir, Judah, Hernandez, Chavez... then therefor he should get no credit for beating them with that logic.

[Sin City]

Floyd came up from Super fefferweight you Hater.....................

&? Manny Pacquiao came up from jr. flyweight..

[Manny Duckman]

How on earth was Floyd bigger??

Hatton is around 158 fight night at WW, while Floyd is 148

[sycomantz]

Manny Pacquiao has a better win over Hatton on his record. FACT.
Faster, more brutal.. and not to mention he was the one coming up in weight NOT Hatton.

and he didnt take hattons ZERO, Floyd did.

how big was Pac's name with hat and may fought? it wasnt

[sycomantz]

Mayweather wasn't the first to beat De La Hoya, Gatti, Baldomir, Judah, Hernandez, Chavez... then therefor he should get no credit for beating them with that logic.

did they have zeros? i think logic is slipping pass you

[Easy-E]

I don't know how people can say that Hatton was damaged goods? It's bull****. Floyd was bigger than Hatton and finished him off in the 10th. Pacquiao was smaller and finished him in the 2nd. I'm not a Floyd hater or anything. I just think it's bull**** when people try to discredit Pacquiao.

Floyd beat and stopped Hatton BEFORE PAC. That is why he can be considered damaged goods. The loss to Mayweather clearly affected Ricky, both physically and mentally, and to deny that is simply ignorant.

[Easy-E]

&? Manny Pacquiao came up from jr. flyweight..

No one is arguing that Floyd is not bigger than Pac, the argument is that Hatton (158), was bigger than FLoyd (148) on fight night.
We know Hatton was also bigger than Pac on fight night.

[Easy-E]

Mayweather wasn't the first to beat De La Hoya, Gatti, Baldomir, Judah, Hernandez, Chavez... then therefor he should get no credit for beating them with that logic.

If you are going to deny that the Mayweather loss did not take alot out of Hatton physically and mentally than there is no reason to argue with you, because your bias is beyond reason.

[Sin City]

If you are going to deny that the Mayweather loss did not take alot out of Hatton physically and mentally than there is no reason to argue with you, because your bias is beyond reason.

Hatton was never that good.. period.
Mayweather didn't take anything out of Hatton.
Hatton looked as ****ty before the Mayweather fight as he did after.
Did you forget the Urango and Collazo fights?
Or did you let his win over a really old Castillo blind you?

Pacquiao beats Hatton in the same manner even before the Mayweather fight.. Mayweather got lucky he got to him first.

[Easy-E]

Hatton was never that good.. period.
Mayweather didn't take anything out of Hatton.
Hatton looked as ****ty before the Mayweather fight as he did after.
Did you forget the Urango and Collazo fights?
Or did you let his win over a really old Castillo blind you?

Pacquiao beats Hatton in the same manner even before the Mayweather fight.. Mayweather got lucky he got to him first.

Like I said, your bias is beyond reason.
Even Hatton admitted the loss shook him mentally, he never had the same "I am the best" confidence he had prior to the Mayweather fight that drove him to 46-0. He was shaken physically, as his chin took a beating that say, and the results were evident when he was rocked by Lazcano twice late and decimated by Pac in two rounds.
I am not saying that Floyd took everything out of him and he was a done fighter after but he definitly stole his confidence and put some serious dents into his chin. Hatton was not the same fighter after he faced Floyd.