Floyd was bigger than Hatton when he KOd him. Pac wasn't.

**Kalion** · 08-05-2009, 02:23 AM

Originally posted by KingTito

I don't know how people can say that Hatton was damaged goods? It's bull****. Floyd was bigger than Hatton and finished him off in the 10th. Pacquiao was smaller and finished him in the 2nd. I'm not a Floyd hater or anything. I just think it's bull**** when people try to discredit Pacquiao.

It really dosent matter when they KOd him or if they KOd him at all. They both have ricky hatton as a win on thier respective records. Thats where the comparison should end.Anything else you draw from it is completely speculative.

**Titing Kabayo** · 08-05-2009, 02:25 AM

Originally posted by KingTito

I don't know how people can say that Hatton was damaged goods? It's bull****. Floyd was bigger than Hatton and finished him off in the 10th. Pacquiao was smaller and finished him in the 2nd. I'm not a Floyd hater or anything. I just think it's bull**** when people try to discredit Pacquiao.

I second the motion..

**sycomantz** · 08-05-2009, 02:27 AM

ill leave it at this. who took Hattons Zero? who laid a blueprint? it was May. **** Pacs winover hatton. he didnt beat him first so it doesnt matter in my book. especially when Hatton didnt look good against Malinaggi.

put one and one together. Hatton was damaged goods...there i said it

**PinoyZoi** · 08-05-2009, 02:27 AM

Well style makes fights, but I dont like how every opponent Pacquiao face the critics either say he fought a old fighter, damaged etc.

**onedream722** · 08-05-2009, 02:28 AM

i think hatton was considered more damaged goods from his pitiful performance against juan lazcano...nothing wrong with losing to floyd while he was moving up to 147..the same division where he almost got knocked out by collazo

**onedream722** · 08-05-2009, 02:29 AM

Originally posted by PinoyZoi

Well style makes fights, but I dont like how every opponent Pacquiao face the critics either say he fought a old fighter, damaged etc.

hatton was also coming into the pac fight not wanting the opportunity to slip away...u cant discredit pac's ko win

**Titing Kabayo** · 08-05-2009, 02:30 AM

No one said Hatton was a dfamaged good after he brutalized Paulie...

**KingTito** · 08-05-2009, 02:30 AM

Originally posted by sycomantz

ill leave it at this. who took Hattons Zero? who laid a blueprint? it was May. **** Pacs winover hatton. he didnt beat him first so it doesnt matter in my book. especially when Hatton didnt look good against Malinaggi.

put one and one together. Hatton was damaged goods...there i said it

Pacquiao and Mayweather fight nothing alike. Are you gonna say that Mayweather laid a blueprint for Pacquiao? Their styles are polar opposites. There's no way in hell that Mayweather could've showed Pacquiao how to beat him. Freddie Roach's gameplan and Pacquiao abilities beat Hatton. Mayweather's "blueprint" did nothing.

**onedream722** · 08-05-2009, 02:31 AM

Originally posted by Hard2kill

No one said Hatton was a dfamaged good after he brutalized Paulie...

that win surprised me...i really thought malignaggi was goin to decision hatton...but then again everyone knows paulie lost because of his hair!!!!! hahaha

Floyd was bigger than Hatton when he KOd him. Pac wasn't.