Tweet
I'm afraid this win has not brought much more enthusiasm out of me for Tim Bradley than what I already have as I am quickly reminded that in his last fight prior to facing Campbell, he was floored twice by the light-hitting Kendall Holt.
Prudence is further dictated by:
1. Having seen in the undercard that Witter was dominated by Alexander in a fashion that makes Bradley's win over Junior (by SD even with a KD) pale by comparison.
2. Noting that Nate's solitary sterling win in more than four years was that SD over Juan Diaz and that in the same period he barely got through Ali Funeka (whose record is tainted by a loss to Mzonke Fanah and whose only claim to some fame is having stopped Zahir Raheem) and, earlier, lost to Isaac Hlatswayo who, in turn, later lost to Holt.
I'll continue to have keen interest in Bradley but I shan't, as yet, put him in the same sentence as Pacquiao. I can hardly wait to see how he does against Lamont Peterson, who, like Bradley and Holt and unlike Pacquiao, is not really a big puncher but quick. I understand Peterson is up next for Tim.
Prudence is further dictated by:
1. Having seen in the undercard that Witter was dominated by Alexander in a fashion that makes Bradley's win over Junior (by SD even with a KD) pale by comparison.
2. Noting that Nate's solitary sterling win in more than four years was that SD over Juan Diaz and that in the same period he barely got through Ali Funeka (whose record is tainted by a loss to Mzonke Fanah and whose only claim to some fame is having stopped Zahir Raheem) and, earlier, lost to Isaac Hlatswayo who, in turn, later lost to Holt.
I'll continue to have keen interest in Bradley but I shan't, as yet, put him in the same sentence as Pacquiao. I can hardly wait to see how he does against Lamont Peterson, who, like Bradley and Holt and unlike Pacquiao, is not really a big puncher but quick. I understand Peterson is up next for Tim.
Comment