Roach: "WBO Will Sanction Pacquiao-Cotto Regardless"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spirit
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2007
    • 994
    • 60
    • 124
    • 7,198

    #11
    Just gotta say this again, the way Cotto his sticking his ground in the negotiations for this fight is very admirable

    Comment

    • Dave Rado
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 8064
      • 266
      • 453
      • 14,460

      #12
      Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
      He wouldnt be stripped. He said if the WBO forces him to defend, he will vacate
      But I don't understand how they can force him, if it's a catchweight fight? And if they did so, that would be unprecedented, AFAIK.

      Comment

      • ..WaRSpencE..
        .::Orgullo Mexicano::.
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 6316
        • 310
        • 132
        • 13,727

        #13
        I'm hoping Cotto lays dis lil nigga FLAT and early!..so Roach can STFU!..

        Roach is starting to annoy the **** outta me!..He's a fucking PUPPET!..he needs to play his position and train..Pacquiao has been a man of very few words..He wants to be a WELTERWEIGHT CHAMPION?!..FIGHT AT THE DAMN LIMIT!!!!..

        and that lil **** Pac will fight DLH at 147 no problem nor questions asked..but when it's for a title in THAT DIVISION he's hesitant?!..Stay your lil ass where you belong if you can't hang with welterweights at their limit!!.PERIOD!

        Comment

        • VaBoriKua 2.0
          Banned
          • Aug 2007
          • 3995
          • 110
          • 47
          • 4,417

          #14
          Theres so much money and legacy at stake and you can see how corrupt this **** is that they are willing to make this bull**** catchweight a mandatory title even if its vacated

          Comment

          • Doctor_Tenma
            Monster
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2009
            • 33313
            • 1,327
            • 1,249
            • 58,127

            #15
            There are many reasons why I have a serious dislike for Pacquiao and Roach, I swear man. We wouldn't have to be hearing none of this bull**** if Pacquiao didn't ***** about a catch weight.
            Last edited by Doctor_Tenma; 08-02-2009, 12:11 AM.

            Comment

            • project xxx1
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 12868
              • 764
              • 1,289
              • 22,511

              #16
              Manny going to be sleeping soon

              ROACH NEEDS TO SHUT THE HELL UP ANT STOP CHATTING SO MUCH RUBBISH.YOU WANT THE TITLE THEN FIGHT AT 147 ANT STOP CRYING

              Comment

              • onedream722
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 3565
                • 108
                • 43
                • 4,469

                #17
                cotto should knock out pac and then go and knockout roach

                Comment

                • briggs33
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 88
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  • 6,444

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Dave Rado
                  But I don't understand how they can force him, if it's a catchweight fight? And if they did so, that would be unprecedented, AFAIK.
                  they are only doing so they can try and get their money out of the fight so even if cotto doesnt want 2 give it up they will make the fight for the vacated title..i wouldnt be surprised if the IBf threw their tite in there 2 so Pac could go for 2 titles in his highest division while fighting at a catchweight...you gotta laugh at the politics of the sport that try to ruin it

                  Comment

                  • RodBarker
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 3857
                    • 177
                    • 0
                    • 4,097

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Dave Rado
                    But I don't understand how they can force him, if it's a catchweight fight? And if they did so, that would be unprecedented, AFAIK.
                    Its easy to understand as its within the WW range and is a legit WW fight the title should be on the line , its not unprecedented It was always this way , if a WC lost a fight below the division weight limit that he is WC of he lost his title , when the title was not on the line the catch weight was always above the limit not below it , this fight is a legal WW fight no matter what way you spin it , in that the title will be on the line or Cotto will be stripped of it , how can you have a situation where a WC gets beat inside his weight class and he still holds the title ,,,,,,, they wont let that happen .

                    Comment

                    • VaBoriKua 2.0
                      Banned
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 3995
                      • 110
                      • 47
                      • 4,417

                      #20
                      Originally posted by KENSHIRO
                      There are many reasons why have a serious dislike for Pacquiao and Roach, I swear man. We wouldn't have to be hearing none of this bull**** if Pacquiao didn't ***** about a catch weight.
                      is like they put so many rules and **** and want everything there way at there advantage instead of just boxing. they make it more like a soapopera with all there lil ****

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP