floyd-manny..last 3 fights..whats the differance??

[FLY TY]

it was the type of TKO's and the odds that they stacked against PAC that made the difference.

if you know a guy has a good chance of beating a guy there is no real hype there

but when odds get stacked up against you and you beat them the way he beat odlh and hatton. then it will get hyped.

it's floyd's ability to run his mouth that people hate him and it doesnt help that his boxing style is SMART but not exciting.

what odds were stacked against pacman?

oscar made more concessions for the pacman fight than he did for the mayweather fight.....

TKO or no TKO, there's no difference between these guys' last 3 fights, people just give manny more credit b/c he moved up in weight.....floyd fought better versions of oscar and hatton than manny did tho....

[larry x]

like i said people just hate floyd personally..point blank period

[DonTaseMeBrah]

like i said people just hate floyd personally..point blank period

why dont you try to refute the points i made instead of retreating to "ohh they just hate him b/c of his personality cop out."

[larry x]

larry brah,

how many times are we gonna go over this? pac is the SMALLER figther who went up in all of his fights to beat bigger fighters in spectacular fashion.

THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE.

mr.counterfeit cash win vs oscar was better than pac but he made hatton move up while pac beat ricky in his ideal weight class. baldo was horrible, so was diaz, that cancels each other out.

THE DIFFERENCE LARRY is that pac started at 106 while mr. counterfeit cash started at what 130. pac's last 3 fights he moved up vs bigger men.

u can even argue the oscar win was better for manny b/c pac went up 3 divisions to beat oscar.

all 3 of his fights were tko/ko & more exciting than mr. counterfeit cash who's last 3 fights were horrible to watch. Factor in the fact that pac was smaller...

advantage = pac.

Dont start that dishonest BS about mr. counterfeit cash beating oscar & ricky first, we can go right ahead & do that to half of your boys win. not every fighter on his resume was undefeated when he beat them.

you cant credit pacman for beating a underweight oscar at 147..and discredit floyd beating a younger wbc 154 oscar

you cant singpacmans praise for beating hatton after floyd ko'd an undefeated hatton 2 years before

baldo was a better win than david diaz...why??cause it was for the lineal title..like it or not baldo was the "real champ"at 147

[goldenglove2]

so pacmans cherry picking as well.right

nope ..........

[larry x]

nope ..........

lmfao..how is he not cherrypicking and floyd is???

[LA BAD BOY]

Nobody really likes BUMWEATHER JR. fighting style.
I mean TIGER WOODS,and DENZEL WASHINGHTON left the arena for reason after eight round!

[FLY TY]

you cant credit pacman for beating a underweight oscar at 147..and discredit floyd beating a younger wbc 154 oscar

you cant singpacmans praise for beating hatton after floyd ko'd an undefeated hatton 2 years before

baldo was a better win than david diaz...why??cause it was for the lineal title..like it or not baldo was the "real champ"at 147

what dude isn't mentioning is that mayweather had to move UP to fight oscar also, and we all can agree, it was a BETTER oscar than the one that stepped into the ring w/ pacman.....

also, pacman actually had to "move down" to fight hatton, b/c hatton was at JWW, while pacman's last fight was at WW.....diaz, i won't go there....

bottom line, i give pacquiao props for moving up 2 divisions and beating oscar, when nobody gave him a chance....i give manny props for THE WAY he beat hatton....

but keep it in perspective, floyd beat both guys years earlier.....

[VaBoriKua 2.0]

Nobody really likes BUMWEATHER JR. fighting style.
I mean TIGER WOODS,and DENZEL WASHINGHTON left the arena for reason after eight round!

your an idiot weather u like it or not floyds undefeated and never weight drained any of his opponents. Both of there best wins are against DLH only difference is Floyd fought Oscar at oscars weight while pacquiao fought a zombie like DLH. This is coming from a non Mayweather fan

[DonTaseMeBrah]

you cant credit pacman for beating a underweight oscar at 147..and discredit floyd beating a younger wbc 154 oscar

you cant singpacmans praise for beating hatton after floyd ko'd an undefeated hatton 2 years before

baldo was a better win than david diaz...why??cause it was for the lineal title..like it or not baldo was the "real champ"at 147

i want you to point out the part in my post where i discredited the oscar win for your boy. i did the exact opposite. i said the win is probably better than pac b/c he fougth him at 154 not 147.

i said arguably u can make a case for pac's win being better b/c he jumped almost 3 divisions, smaller guy, he tko'd oscar compared to a split decision, more exciting to watch.

as for mr.counterfeit cash ko'ing & beating hatton first, what are we to make of the other 9 losses on baldomir's record before, or the 4 losses on castillo's record before mr.counterfeit cash got to him, or gattis losses before, i guess that win vs oscar is **** b/c bhop ko'd him before your boy got to him.

baldo was lineal but he was far from being the best welterweight.

like i said before,

oscar win - mr.counterfeit cash
hatton win- pac
baldo/david diaz- push.

casamayor was the lineal champ but he was beaten by santa cruz but got robbed of a decision. santa cruz got KTFO by the same david diaz.

i guess u can taint that win by your boy over zab b/c david diaz beat him in the olympic trials. younger fresher version of judah.

Lets not go by this type of reasoning.

see what happens.